Beyond the Adaptationist Legacy: Updating Our Teaching to Include a Diversity of Evolutionary Mechanisms

Author:

Price Rebecca M.1,Perez Kathryn E.2

Affiliation:

1. REBECCA M. PRICE is an Associate Professor at the University of Washington Bothell, Bothell, WA 98011; e-mail: beccap@uw.edu.

2. KATHRYN E. PEREZ is an Assistant Professor at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX 78539; e-mail: perezke@gmail.com.

Abstract

A paradigm shift away from viewing evolution primarily in terms of adaptation – the “adaptationist programme” of Gould and Lewontin – began in evolutionary research more than 35 years ago, but that shift has yet to occur within evolutionary education research or within teaching standards. We review three instruments that can help education researchers and educators undertake this paradigm shift. The instruments assess how biology undergraduates understand three evolutionary processes other than natural selection: genetic drift, dominance relationships among allelic pairs, and evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo). Testing with these instruments reveals that students often explain a diversity of evolutionary mechanisms incorrectly by invoking misconceptions about natural selection. We propose that increasing the emphasis on teaching evolutionary processes other than natural selection could result in a better understanding of natural selection and a better understanding of all evolutionary processes. Finally, we propose two strategies for accomplishing this goal, interleaving natural selection with other evolutionary processes and the development of bridging analogies to describe evolutionary concepts.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Education

Reference53 articles.

1. AAAS (2009). Benchmarks On-line. http://www.project2061.org/tools/benchol/bolframe.html.

2. AAAS (2011). Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action. Washington, DC: AAAS.

3. AAAS (2015). AAAS Science Assessment Website. Available online at http://assessment.aaas.org/.

4. Abraham, J.K., Perez, K.E. & Price, R.M. (2014). The Dominance Concept Inventory: a tool for assessing undergraduate student alternative conceptions about dominance in Mendelian and population genetics.CBE Life Sciences Education, 13, 349–358.

5. Adams, W.K. & Wieman, C.E. (2011). Development and validation of instruments to measure learning of expert-like thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1289–1312.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3