What Do Prospective Research Participants Want to Know? What Do They Assume They Know Already?

Author:

Walkup James1,Bock Elinor2

Affiliation:

1. Rutgers University

2. New School for Social Research

Abstract

Using a framework based on conversational pragmatics, data were collected on spontaneous information requests by people who were invited to participate in a simple research study. Subjects requested information on some standard elements of consent (e.g., scientific purpose, time required, investigator), but not others (e.g., voluntariness, freedom to quit, data maintenance, risks). Using post hoc fixed response queries, we investigated factors responsible for absence of queries on elements of consent. We found that participants sometimes did not ask because they assumed they already knew the answer; other times they did not care about the answer. This small pilot study suggests that inclusion of elements considered inappropriate by respondents may be redundant and, in at least some circumstances, potentially confusing.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Communication,Education,Social Psychology

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Exploring the Future of Informed Consent: Applying a Service Design Approach;Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction;2024-04-17

2. Inform the Uninformed: Improving Online Informed Consent Reading with an AI-Powered Chatbot;Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2023-04-19

3. Informational needs for participation in bioequivalence studies: the perspectives of experienced volunteers;European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology;2019-08-19

4. Seeking Ways to Inform the Uninformed: Improving the Informed Consent Process in Online Social Science Research;Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics;2017-11-08

5. Informed consent in research on second language acquisition;Second Language Research;2016-10-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3