Affiliation:
1. Johns Hopkins University
Abstract
Abstract The commemorative forms of the Romans are marked by the ubiquity of two contrasting presentational modes: one essentially mimetic, rooted in the representational power of artistic forms, the other abstract and figurative, dependent on the presentation of cues for the summoning of absent yet necessary images. The mimetic mode was thoroughly conventional, and thus posed few problems of interpretation; the figurative knew no such orthodoxy and required a different and distinctive form of attention. At the tomb, epigraphic and sculptural forms, each in its characteristic manner, addressed an audience habituated by tradition to respond to both of these modes, to grasp their differences, and to rise to the challenge implicit in the very fact of their contrast.
Publisher
University of California Press
Reference90 articles.
1. Alpers, S. 1983. The Art of Describing. Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century. Chicago.
2. Baldassare, I. 1998. "Documenti di pittura ellenistica da Napoli." In L'italie meridionale et les premieres experiences de la peinture hellenistique, 96-149 (Actes de la table ronde, Rome, 1994 = Collection de l'ecole fran aise de Rome, 244), 96-149. Rome.
3. Bergmann, B. 1994. "The Roman House as Memory Theater: The House of the Tragic
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献