Abstract
Pedagogical practices such as active learning and group-based exercises are increasingly being used to engage students in course content during class meetings. However, techniques employed in class may not always contribute to engagement outside of the class meetings, or to student satisfaction with the course itself. Previous reports have shown that student autonomy and initial perceptions of the course setup influence their engagement and satisfaction, independent of the course context. To address engagement in an upper level collegiate biology class, students were allowed to choose their own assignments accounting for 50% of their total grade and also choose the due dates for those assignments; the remaining 50% came from exam scores. The goal was to allow students the option to pick assignments that best reflected their perceived strengths and preferences in order to determine whether these options increased students’ satisfaction and engagement with the course content. Students were surveyed with questionnaires at the beginning and end of the semester to monitor their perception of the course setup, their interest in the course content, and their satisfaction with the course. Comparing initial perception of the course layout with final experiences, students reported that assignment choice did increase interest in the course and resulted in a student-reported increase in personal responsibility within the course.
Publisher
University of California Press
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Education
Reference17 articles.
1. Asikainen, H., & Gijbels, D. (2017). Do students develop towards more deep approaches to learning during studies? A systematic review on the development of students’ deep and surface approaches to learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 205–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9406-6
2. Didicher, N. (2016). Bento and buffet: Two approaches to flexible summative assessment. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 9, 167. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v9i0.4435
3. Diseth, Å. (2007). Approaches to learning, course experience and examination grade among undergraduate psychology students: Testing of mediator effects and construct validity. Studies in Higher Education, 32(3), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701346949
4. Dosch, M. V. (2011). “The Course Fit Us”: Differentiated Instruction in the College Classroom. PhD dissertation, ProQuest LLC, University of North Dakota. Retrieved fromhttp://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml
5. Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment: Introduction to the special issue. Higher Education, 22(3), 201–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132287