Political Responses to Black Lives Matter in Education

Author:

Furrey Gavin1

Affiliation:

1. Independent scholar

Abstract

In the wake of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement, teachers and organizations have tried to better prepare other teachers and all students to reckon with the movement in the classroom. In reaction to new pedagogical tools and practices developed by teachers, teachers’ unions, and teachers’ organizations, new policies have come about in state legislatures in 2021 and 2022 to limit education on racism and related topics. This paper reviews the current literature on how teachers and organizations have developed new pedagogical tools and strategies in response to BLM. It also includes a content analysis of thirty-nine legislative documents presented in 2021 and 2022, as well as a case study of Arizona and South Dakota, to study how states responded to the BLM movement and the efforts of educators who sought to reckon with it through critical pedagogy. This paper engages literature on social movements to observe that while the effects of BLM on relationships between educators and organizations have been largely positive, the movement’s macro-level effects in the wider political climate have been of a negative, more anti-social nature. Furthermore, one can observe how “Critical Race Theory” has been mobilized in a discourse that can be characterized as “competitive victimhood,” serving as a catch-all for concepts related to equity, diversity, inclusion, and other “threatening” ideas. This paper concludes that the slew of state-level legislation in the realm of public education in 2021 and 2022 is a response to the ideas advanced in the BLM movement, and the repetitive nature of the documents suggests organization by right-wing think tanks.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

Religious studies,Cultural Studies

Reference104 articles.

1. “The 1619 Project.” New York Times, 14August2019. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/08/14/magazine/1619-america-slavery.html

2. “1776 Action.” 1776 Action, n.d.https://www.1776action.org/(accessed 30 March 2022).

3. “About – Black Lives Matter.” Black Lives Matter, n.d, https://blacklivesmatter.com/about/(accessed 7 May 2022)

4. “About.” BLM AT SCHOOL, n.dhttps://www.blacklivesmatteratschool.com/about.html(accessed 28 April 2022)

5. ACLU. “South Dakota Governor Drops Anti-Protest Laws in Settlement Agreement with ACLU.” American Civil Liberties Union, 23October2019. https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/south-dakota-governor-drops-anti-protest-laws-settlement-agreement-aclu.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3