Historical foundations and contemporary expressions of a right to health care in Circumpolar Indigenous contexts

Author:

Lavoie Josée G.1,Stoor Jon Petter2,Rink Elizabeth3,Cueva Katie4,Gladun Elena5,Larsen Christina Viskum Lytken6,Akearok Gwen Healey7,Kanayurak Nicole8

Affiliation:

1. Ongomiizwin Research, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

2. Sámi Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Mental Health and Substance Use (SANKS), Finnmark Hospital Trust, Karasjok, Norway

3. University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA

4. Institute of Social and Economic Research (ISER), University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, USA

5. University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia

6. University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

7. Qaujigiartiit Health Research Centre, Iqaluit, Nunavut, Canada

8. North Slope Borough, Utqiagvik, AK, USA

Abstract

Although numerous comparative Indigenous health policy analyses exist in the literature, to date, little attention has been paid to comparative analyses of Circumpolar health policy and the impact these policies may have on Indigenous peoples’ rights to health. In this article, we ground our discussion of Indigenous peoples’ right to access culturally appropriate and responsive health care within the context of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). Under UNDRIP, signatory states are obligated to guarantee that Indigenous peoples have access to the same services accessible to all citizens without discrimination. Signatory states must also guarantee access to services that are grounded in Indigenous cultures, medicines, and practices and must address Indigenous peoples’ determinants of health at least to the same extent as their national counterparts. Our analysis finds that the implementation of this declaration varies across the Circumpolar north. The United States recognizes an obligation to provide health care for American Indian and Alaska Native people in exchange for the land that was taken from them. Other countries provide Indigenous citizens access to care in the same health care systems as other citizens. Intercultural models of care exist in Alaska and to some extent across the Canadian territories. However, aside from Sámi Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Mental Health and Substance Use in northern Norway, intercultural models are absent in Nordic countries and in Greenland. While Russia has not ratified UNDRIP, Russian policy guarantees access to health care to all citizens, although access is particularly limited in rural and remote environments, including the Russian Arctic. We conclude that Circumpolar nations should begin and/or expand commitments to culturally appropriate, self-determined, access to health care in Circumpolar contexts to reduce health inequities and adhere to obligations outlined in UNDRIP.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

Atmospheric Science,Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Ecology,Environmental Engineering,Oceanography

Reference155 articles.

1. Aaen-Larsen, B. 2004. Health care in the circumpolar world: Greenland. International Journal of Circumpolar Health 63(Suppl 2): 49–53. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v63i0.17785.

2. Alaska Native Medical Center. 2020. Anchorage, AK: Alaska Native Medical Center. Available at https://anmc.org/.

3. “Rewriting” cultural safety within the postcolonial and postnational feminist project, toward new epistemologies of healing;Advances in Nursing Science,2003

4. Arctic Council. 2019. Russian Association of Indigenous Peoples of the North (RAIPON). Tromsø, Norway: Arctic Council Secretariat. Available at https://arctic-council.org/index.php/en/about-us/permanent-participants/raipon.

5. Baba, L. 2013. Cultural safety in First Nations, Inuit and Métis public health: Environmental scan of cultural competency and safety in education, training and health services. Prince George, Canada: National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health. Available at https://www.ccnsa-nccah.ca/docs/emerging/RPT-CulturalSafetyPublicHealth-Baba-EN.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3