Climate change governance in the anthropocene: emergence of polycentrism in Chile

Author:

Arriagada Rodrigo123ORCID,Aldunce Paulina145,Blanco Gustavo167,Ibarra Cecilia1,Moraga Pilar18,Nahuelhual Laura197,O’Ryan Raúl110,Urquiza Anahí111,Gallardo Laura112

Affiliation:

1. Center for Climate and Resilience Research (CR2, FONDAP15110009), CL

2. Departamento de Ecosistemas y Medioambiente, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, CL

3. Millennium Nucleus Center for the Socioeconomic Impact of Environmental Policies (CESIEP), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, CL

4. Departamento de Ciencias Ambientales y Recursos Naturales Renovables, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, CL

5. Programa de Reducción de Riesgos y Desastres (CITRID), CL

6. Instituto de Historia y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, CL

7. Centro de Investigación en Dinámica de Ecosistemas Marinos de Altas Latitudes (IDEAL, FONDAP15150003), CL

8. Centro de Derecho Ambiental, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, CL

9. Instituto de Economía Agraria, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, CL

10. Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, CL

11. Departamento de Antropología, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, CL

12. Departamento de Geofísica, Universidad de Chile, CL

Abstract

Multilateral efforts are essential to an effective response to climate change, but individual nations define climate action policy by translating local and global objectives into adaptation and mitigation actions. We propose a conceptual framework to explore opportunities for polycentric climate governance, understanding polycentricity as a property that encompasses the potential for coordinating multiple centers of semiautonomous decision-making. We assert that polycentrism engages a diverse array of public and private actors for a more effective approach to reducing the threat of climate change. In this way, polycentrism may provide an appropriate strategy for addressing the many challenges of climate governance in the Anthropocene. We review two Chilean case studies: Chile’s Nationally Determined Contribution on Climate Change and the Chilean National Climate Change Action Plan. Our examination demonstrates that Chile has included a diversity of actors and directed significant financial resources to both processes. The central government coordinated both of these processes, showing the key role of interventions at higher jurisdictional levels in orienting institutional change to improve strategic planning and better address climate change. Both processes also provide some evidence of knowledge co-production, while at the same time remaining primarily driven by state agencies and directed by technical experts. Efforts to overcome governance weaknesses should focus on further strengthening existing practices for climate change responses, establishing new institutions, and promoting decision-making that incorporates diverse social actors and multiple levels of governance. In particular, stronger inclusion of local level actors provides an opportunity to enhance polycentric modes of governance and improve climate change responses. Fully capitalizing on this opportunity requires establishing durable communication channels between different levels of governance.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

Atmospheric Science,Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Ecology,Environmental Engineering,Oceanography

Reference66 articles.

1. Aldunce, P, Bello, F, Bórquez, R, Farah, ML, Echeverría, I, Indvik, K, Lillo, G, Montenegro, N, Orell, MI, Paneque, M, Rebolledo, I, Reveco, C, Román-Figueroa, C, Sepulveda, E, Fuster, R, Adler, C, Costa, L, Guijón, R, Howden, M, Keenan, R, Neri, C, Rojas, M and Rudnick, A. 2014. Evaluación de término del Plan de Acción Nacional de Cambio Climático, PANCC 2008-2016, Licitación Nº 608897-101-LE14 del Ministerio del Medio Ambiente. 240. Available at: http://www.cr2.cl/evaluacion-final-del-plan-nacional-de-accion-de-cambio-climatico-2008-2012/. Accessed January 9, 2017.

2. Navigating complexity: From cultural critique to cultural intelligence;Continuum,2011

3. Collaborative governance for climate change adaptation: Experimenting with adaptive co-management from a social network perspective;Reg. Environ. Chang,2016

4. Bringing water markets down to earth: The political economy of water rights in Chile, 1976–95;World Development,1997

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3