A closer look at underground natural gas pipeline leaks across the United States
Author:
Cho Younki1, Smits Kathleen M.2, Steadman Nathaniel L.3, Ulrich Bridget A.4, Bell Clay S.1, Zimmerle Daniel J.1
Affiliation:
1. 1Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA 2. 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA 3. 3Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA 4. 4Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, USA
Abstract
Underground natural gas (NG) pipeline leakage can result in methane (CH4) buildup and migration through the soil. What is not well understood in such scenarios is how the soil conditions affect the gas migration behavior, particularly in regard to the relative contributions of specific soil properties such as soil moisture content. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of soil properties on CH4 concentration and migration from leaking underground NG pipelines. Site characteristics such as surface cover and spatial dimensions, soil samples, and gas concentration data were collected from over 70 gas leakage sites across the United States using a standardized sampling method. Soil samples were collected from excavation sites that were 1.5′–5′ in depth. The collected soil samples were analyzed in the laboratory to measure the soil texture, permeability, and moisture. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of soil properties on CH4 migration distance and concentration. Soil texture was consistent across geographic locations due to standardized pipeline backfill protocols, allowing for the analysis of gas concentration and transport data with respect to soil conditions. Soil moisture content was the dominant influence on the gas concentration and spreading distance. High soil moisture content was associated with reduced lateral diffusion and elevated concentrations near the leak point, whereas dry conditions were associated with reduced concentrations and greater spreading distance. Increasing soil moisture content reduced the lateral diffusion of CH4 into the soil due to water-induced tortuosity, resulting in elevated concentrations close to the leak point. Lateral migration of CH4 was suspected to be by diffusion, starting at 5 m from the leaks, while transport within the immediate vicinity of the leak was controlled by advection. These findings demonstrate a pronounced effect of soil moisture content and permeability on CH4 migration distance and concentration, providing key insight into the effects of soil conditions on NG migration and how to account for such effects in leak detection surveys.
Publisher
University of California Press
Subject
Atmospheric Science,Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Ecology,Environmental Engineering,Oceanography
Reference64 articles.
1. Abriola, LM, Pinder, GF. 1985. A multiphase approach to the modeling of porous media contamination by organic compounds: 1. Equation development. Water Resources Research21(1): 11–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/WR021i001p00011. 2. Allen, DT, Pacsi, AP, Sullivan, DW, Zavala-Araiza, D, Harrison, M, Keen, K, Fraser, MP, Daniel Hill, A, Sawyer, RF, Seinfeld, JH.2015. Methane emissions from process equipment at natural gas production sites in the United States: Pneumatic controllers. Environmental Science & Technology49(1): 633–640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es5040156. 3. Allen, DT, Torres, VM, Thomas, J, Sullivan, DW, Harrison, M, Hendler, A, Herndon, SC, Kolb, CE, Fraser, MP, Hill, AD, Lamb, BK, Miskimins, J, Sawyer, RF, Seinfeld, JH.2013. Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America110(44): 17768–17773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304880110. 4. Arthur, E, Moldrup, P, Schjønning, P, de Jonge, LW. 2012. Linking particle and pore size distribution parameters to soil gas transport properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal76(1): 18–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/SSSAJ2011.0125. 5. Bell, CS, Vaughn, TL, Zimmerle, D, Herndon, SC, Yacovitch, TI, Heath, GA, Pétron, G, Edie, R, Field, RA, Murphy, SM, Robertson, AM, Soltis, J.2017. Comparison of methane emission estimates from multiple measurement techniques at natural gas production pads. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene5: 79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.266.
|
|