Spatiotemporal evolution of melt ponds on Arctic sea ice

Author:

Webster Melinda A.1,Holland Marika2,Wright Nicholas C.3,Hendricks Stefan4,Hutter Nils4,Itkin Polona5,Light Bonnie6,Linhardt Felix7,Perovich Donald K.8,Raphael Ian A.8,Smith Madison M.6,von Albedyll Luisa4,Zhang Jinlun6

Affiliation:

1. Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA

2. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA

3. Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH, USA

4. Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Alfred Wegener Institute, Bremerhaven, Germany

5. Norwegian Polar Institute, Tromsø, Norway

6. Polar Science Center, Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

7. Institut für Geographie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany

8. Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA

Abstract

Melt ponds on sea ice play an important role in the Arctic climate system. Their presence alters the partitioning of solar radiation: decreasing reflection, increasing absorption and transmission to the ice and ocean, and enhancing melt. The spatiotemporal properties of melt ponds thus modify ice albedo feedbacks and the mass balance of Arctic sea ice. The Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition presented a valuable opportunity to investigate the seasonal evolution of melt ponds through a rich array of atmosphere-ice-ocean measurements across spatial and temporal scales. In this study, we characterize the seasonal behavior and variability in the snow, surface scattering layer, and melt ponds from spring melt to autumn freeze-up using in situ surveys and auxiliary observations. We compare the results to satellite retrievals and output from two models: the Community Earth System Model (CESM2) and the Marginal Ice Zone Modeling and Assimilation System (MIZMAS). During the melt season, the maximum pond coverage and depth were 21% and 22 ± 13 cm, respectively, with distribution and depth corresponding to surface roughness and ice thickness. Compared to observations, both models overestimate melt pond coverage in summer, with maximum values of approximately 41% (MIZMAS) and 51% (CESM2). This overestimation has important implications for accurately simulating albedo feedbacks. During the observed freeze-up, weather events, including rain on snow, caused high-frequency variability in snow depth, while pond coverage and depth remained relatively constant until continuous freezing ensued. Both models accurately simulate the abrupt cessation of melt ponds during freeze-up, but the dates of freeze-up differ. MIZMAS accurately simulates the observed date of freeze-up, while CESM2 simulates freeze-up one-to-two weeks earlier. This work demonstrates areas that warrant future observation-model synthesis for improving the representation of sea-ice processes and properties, which can aid accurate simulations of albedo feedbacks in a warming climate.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

Atmospheric Science,Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Ecology,Environmental Engineering,Oceanography

Reference69 articles.

1. Anhaus, P, Katlein, C, Nicolaus, M, Hoppmann, M, Haas, C. 2021. From bright windows to dark spots: Snow cover controls melt pond optical properties during refreezing. Geophysical Research Letters48(23): e2021GL095369. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10507628.2.

2. Bailey, DA, Holland, MM, DuVivier, AK, Hunke, EC, Turner, AK. 2020. Impact of a new sea ice thermodynamic formulation in the CESM2 sea ice component. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems12: e2020MS002154. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002154.

3. Brandt, RE, Warren, SG, Worby, AP, Grenfell, TC. 2005. Surface albedo of the Antarctic sea-ice zone. Journal of Climate18: 3606–3622. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3489.1.

4. Buckley, EM, Farrell, SL, Duncan, K, Connor, LN, Kuhn, JM, Dominguez, RT. 2020. Classification of sea ice summer melt features in high-resolution IceBridge imagery. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans125. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015738.

5. Danabasoglu, G, Lamarque, JF, Bachmeister, J, Bailey, DA, DuVivier, AK, Edwards, J, Emmons, LK, Fasullo, J, Garcia, R, Gettelman, A, Hannay, C, Holland, MM, Large, WG, Lauritzen, PH, Lawrence, DM, Lenaerts, JTM, Lindsay, K, Lipscomb, WH, Mills, MJ, Neale, R, Oleson, KW, Otto-Bliesner, B, Phillips, AS, Sacks, W, Tilmes, S, van Kampenhout, L, Vertenstein, M, Bertini, A, Dennis, J, Deser, C, Fischer, C, Fox-Kemper, B, Kay, JE, Kinnison, D, Kushner, PJ, Larson, VE, Long, MC, Mickelson, S, Moore, JK, Nienhouse, E, Polvani, L, Rasch, PJ, Strand, WG. 2020. The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2). Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems12. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001916.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3