A cooperative model to lower cost and increase the efficiency of methane leak inspections at oil and gas sites

Author:

Gao Mozhou1ORCID,Hugenholtz Chris H.1,Staples Marshall1,Barchyn Thomas E.1,Gough Tyler R.1,Vollrath Coleman1,Xing Zhenyu1

Affiliation:

1. 1Centre for Smart Emissions Sensing Technologies, Department of Geography, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Abstract

Methane is a potent greenhouse gas that tends to leak from equipment at oil and gas (O&G) sites. Conventional leak detection and repair methods for fugitive methane emissions are labor-intensive and costly because they involve time-consuming close-range, component-level inspections at each site. This has prompted duty holders to examine new methods and strategies that could be more cost-effective. We examined a cooperative model in which multiple duty holders of upstream O&G sites in a region use shared services to inspect on-site equipment using optical gas imaging camera or Method 21. This approach was hypothesized to be more efficient and cost-effective than independent inspection programs by each duty holder in the region. To test this hypothesis, we developed a geospatial simulation model using empirical data from 11 O&G-producing regions in Canada and the United States. We used the model to compare labor cost, transit time, mileage, vehicle emissions, and driving risk between independent and co-op leak inspection programs. The results indicate that co-op leak inspection programs can generate relative savings in labor costs (1.8%–34.2%), transit time (0.6%–38.6%), mileage (0.2%–43.1%), vehicle emissions (0.01–4.0 tCO2), and driving risk (1.9%–31.9%). The largest relative savings and efficiency gains resulting from co-op leak inspection programs were in regions with a high diversity of duty holders, which was confirmed with simulations of fictitious O&G sites and road networks spanning diverse conditions. We also found reducing leak inspection time by 75% with streamlined methods can additionally reduce labor cost by 8.8%–41.1%, transit time by 5.6%–20.2%, and mileage by 2.60%–34.3% in co-op leak inspection programs. Overall, this study demonstrates that co-op leak inspection programs can be more efficient and cost-effective, particularly in regions with a large diversity of O&G duty holders, and that methods to reduce leak inspection time can create additional savings.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

Atmospheric Science,Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Ecology,Environmental Engineering,Oceanography

Reference35 articles.

1. Alberta Energy Regulator. 2017. Methane abatement costs: Alberta[online].Alberta Energy Regulator. Available athttps://static.aer.ca/prd/documents/DelphiAlbertaMethaneAbatementCostStudy.pdf. Accessed February 20, 2023.

2. Alberta Energy Regulator. 2021. ST37: List of wells in Alberta[online].Alberta Energy Regulator. Available athttps://www.aer.ca/providinginformation/data-and-reports/statistical-reports/st3. Accessed February 20, 2023.

3. Alberta Energy Regulator. 2022. Directive 060[online].Alberta Energy Regulator. Available athttps://www.aer.ca/regulating-development/rules-and-directives/directives/directive-060.html. Accessed February 20, 2023.

4. Barchyn, T, Hugenholtz, C.2020. University of Calgary rapid vehicle-based methane emissions mapping system (PoMELO) single-blind testing results from the Methane Emissions Technology Evaluation Center (METEC)[online]. Available athttps://pomelo-methane.ca/UCalgary_PoMELO_METEC_Detection_2020.pdf. Accessed February 19, 2023.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3