Detection, localization, and quantification of single-source methane emissions on oil and gas production sites using point-in-space continuous monitoring systems
Author:
Daniels William S.1ORCID, Jia Meng1ORCID, Hammerling Dorit M.12ORCID
Affiliation:
1. 1Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA 2. 2Energy Emissions Modeling and Data Lab, Austin, TX, USA
Abstract
We propose a modular framework for methane emission detection, localization, and quantification on oil and gas production sites that uses concentration and wind data from point-in-space continuous monitoring systems. The framework leverages a gradient-based spike detection algorithm to estimate emission start and end times (event detection) and pattern matches simulated and observed concentrations to estimate emission source location (localization) and rate (quantification). The framework was evaluated on a month of non-blinded, single-source controlled releases ranging from 0.50 to 8.25 h in duration and 0.18 to 6.39 kg/h in size. All controlled releases are detected and 82% are localized correctly; 5.5% of estimated events are false positives. For emissions ≤1 kg/h, the framework underestimates the emission rate by −3.9% on average, with 90% of rate estimates falling within a percent difference of [−74.9%, 195.2%] from the true rate. For emissions >1 kg/h, the framework overestimates the emission rate by 4.3% on average, with 90% of rate estimates falling within a percent difference of [−49.3%, 78.8%] from the true rate. Potential uses for the proposed framework include near real time alerting for rapid emission mitigation and emission quantification for use in measurement-informed inventories on production sites.
Publisher
University of California Press
Reference37 articles.
1. Allen, DT, Cardoso-Saldaña, FJ, Kimura, Y.2017. Variability in spatially and temporally resolved emissions and hydrocarbon source fingerprints for oil and gas sources in Shale gas production regions. Environmental Science and Technology51(20): 12016–12026. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02202. 2. Alvarez, RA, Zavala-Araiza, D, Lyon, DR, Allen, DT, Barkley, ZR, Brandt, AR, Davis, KJ, Herndon, SC, Jacob, DJ, Karion, A, Kort, EA, Lamb, BK, Lauvaux, T, Maasakkers, JD, Marchese, AJ, Omara, M, Pacala, SW, Peischl, J, Robinson, AL, Shepson, PB, Sweeney, C, Townsend-Small, A, Wofsy, SC, Hamburg, SP.2018. Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain. Science361(6398): 186–188. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aar7204. 3. Bell, C, Ilonze, C, Duggan, A, Zimmerle, D.2023. Performance of continuous emission monitoring solutions under a single-blind controlled testing protocol. Environmental Science and Technology57(14): 5794–5805. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ACS.EST.2C09235. 4. Bell, C, Rutherford, J, Brandt, A, Sherwin, E, Vaughn, T, Zimmerle, D.2022. Single-blind determination of methane detection limits and quantification accuracy using aircraft-based LiDAR. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene10(1): 00080. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/ELEMENTA.2022.00080. 5. Brandt, AR, Heath, GA, Cooley, D.2016. Methane leaks from natural gas systems follow extreme distributions. Environmental Science and Technology50(22): 12512–12520. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ACS.EST.6B04303.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Integrating IoT, AI, and Cloud Technologies for Sustainable Oilfield Operations;2024 9th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analytics (ICCCBDA);2024-04-25
|
|