From access toward sovereignty: A scoping review of municipal land access policies for urban agriculture in the United States

Author:

Santo Raychel E.123ORCID,Lupolt Sara N.124,Uhde Katherine M.56,Bennaton Robert C.73,Nachman Keeve E.1248ORCID

Affiliation:

1. 1Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

2. 2Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

3. †Raychel E. Santo and Robert C. Bennaton’s affiliations reflect their affiliations at the time of project contribution

4. 3Risk Sciences and Public Policy Institute, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

5. 4UC Cooperative Extension-Santa Clara County, San Jose, CA, USA

6. 5Bloomberg American Health Initiative, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

7. 6UC Cooperative Extension-Alameda County, Hayward, CA, USA

8. 7Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

Abstract

Accessing land—and protecting that access—for the purpose of growing food and other agricultural products is a significant challenge in urban agriculture (UA), an issue exacerbated by racial and wealth disparities and high land values in cities. While local policies and programs supporting the use or sale of public land for UA have increased steadily since the early 21st century, limited research has examined the diversity, accessibility, and permanency of mechanisms facilitating land access and tenure. To address this gap, we compared the availability and characteristics of land access mechanisms across the 40 most populous U.S. cities. While 75% of cities employed at least one mechanism to facilitate land access, few (20%) offered multiple options. Mechanisms facilitating temporary use of public land for UA such as Adopt-A-Lot programs and city-run farms and gardens were more common than those enabling more secure tenure through long-term leases, land trusts, and simplified sales processes. Most policies and programs explicitly focused on local residents and nonprofit/community groups rather than for-profit entities. Nearly half (45%) of cities designed their land access mechanisms with a focus on equity or supporting underserved populations. Less than a quarter of cities offered subsidized water access, liability insurance, soil testing, or funding to complement public land access. The diversity of available mechanisms for facilitating land access underscores how different cities are enabling UA for different goals. Additionally, the incongruence between advocates’ demands for land sovereignty and the mechanisms currently offered raise questions about the extent to which cities are advancing permanent land reforms or provisional interventions at risk of revocation. Our findings may be of use to policymakers and advocates who are creating, comparing, and adapting land access policies and programs to best address growers’ needs and advance sustainable and equitable food transformations.

Publisher

University of California Press

Reference44 articles.

1. Ackoff, S, Bahrenburg, A, Shute, LL.2017. Building a future with farmers II: Results and recommendations from the national young farmer survey. National Young Farmer Coalition: 1–86. Available athttps://www.youngfarmers.org/resource/building-a-future-with-farmers-ii/. Accessed June 08, 2023.

2. Land ownership, youth and agricultural performance among maize farmers in Republic of Benin;Journal of Land and Rural Studies,2019

3. Baltimore City Office of Sustainability. 2010. Preserving community-managed open spaces: Criteria and process. Baltimore, MD: Baltimore Green Space. Available athttps://www.baltimoresustainability.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018/05/CMOSguide_000.pdf. Accessed May 28, 2023.

4. Barraclough, LR. 2009. South Central farmers and Shadow Hills homeowners: Land use policy and relational racialization in Los Angeles. The Professional Geographer61(2): 164–186. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00330120902735767.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Forging Pathways to Equity: The Nexus between Land Redistribution, Health, and Healthcare Access;International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT);2024-08-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3