Succession of bacterial community structure in response to a one-time application of biochar in barley rhizosphere and bulk soils
Author:
Yu Lu1ORCID, Homyak Peter M.2, Li Liangzhong3, Gu Haiping4
Affiliation:
1. 1Institute of Circular Economy, Faculty of Materials and Manufacturing, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China 2. 2Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA 3. 3State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Health Risk Assessment, Center for Environmental Health Research, South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Guangzhou, China 4. 4College of Forestry, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China
Abstract
Biochar is often used as an amendment to enhance soil fertility by directly increasing soil pH and nutrient availability. However, biochar may also improve soil fertility indirectly by altering the succession of bacterial communities that, in turn, may alter nutrient supply and availability. To determine how biochar affects soil bacterial richness and diversity, as well as how bacterial communities respond to biochar across space and time, we studied the rhizosphere and bulk soils of potted barley plants for 2 years. Adding biochar significantly increased bacterial community richness (Chao 1 richness index) by the end of the second year in the rhizosphere (P = 0.037), but in bulk soils, we observed an increase in richness in Year 1 that dissipated by Year 2. In contrast to richness, adding biochar only had a significant effect on bacterial community diversity (Shannon diversity index) in Year 1 seedling stage (P < 0.001), but the effect dissipated thereafter. We also found that adding biochar increased the relative abundances of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria but decreased the relative abundances of Acidobacteria and Chloroflexi, suggesting these communities were sensitive to biochar inputs. The biochar-sensitive genera belonging to Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria made up 45%–58% of sensitive taxa in both rhizosphere and bulk soils. Of the Proteobacteria sensitive to adding biochar, Nitrosospira and Sphingomonas were most abundant in the rhizosphere relative to bulk soils. However, despite the initial increase of biochar sensitive responders in the rhizosphere, their numbers decreased after 2 years and had 179 fewer genera than bulk soils. Our findings suggest the effect of adding biochar was relatively short-lived and that the influence of the plant phenology was a stronger driver of bacterial community change than biochar inputs 2 years after its application. Altogether, the succession of soil bacterial community structure reflected changes in the soil environment induced by the combined effect of biochar, rhizospheric inputs, and plant phenology, suggesting that changes in microbial community composition observed after amending soils with biochar, may also contribute to changes in soil fertility.
Publisher
University of California Press
Subject
Atmospheric Science,Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Ecology,Environmental Engineering,Oceanography
Reference62 articles.
1. Adair, EC, Burke, IC.2010. Plant phenology and life span influence soil pool dynamics: Bromus tectorum invasion of perennial C3–C4 grass communities. Plant and Soil335: 255–269. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0413-3. 2. Baquy, MA, Li, J, Jiang, J, Mehmood, K, Shi, R, Xu, R.2018. Critical pH and exchangeable Al of four acidic soils derived from different parent materials for maize crops. Journal of Soil and Sediments18: 1490–1499. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1887-x. 3. Caporaso, JG, Kuczynski, J, Stombaugh, J, Bittinger, K, Bushman, FD, Costello, EK, Fierer, N, Peña, AG, Goodrich, JK, Gordon, JI, Huttley, GA, Kelley, ST, Knights, D, Koenig, JE, Ley, RE, Lozupone, CA, McDonald, D, Muegge, BD, Pirrung, M, Reeder, J, Sevinsky, JR, Tumbaugh, PJ, Walters, WA, Widmann, J, Yatsunenko, T, Zaneveld, J, Knight, R.2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature Methods7: 335–336. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303. 4. Cesarano, G, Filippis, FD, Storia, AL, Scala, F, Bonanomi, G.2017. Organic amendment type and application frequency affect crop yields, soil fertility and microbiome composition. Applied Soil Ecology120: 254–264. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.08.017. 5. Chao, A.
1984. Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics11: 265–270. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615964.
|
|