Estimating methane emissions from underground natural gas pipelines using an atmospheric dispersion-based method

Author:

Tian Shanru1,Smits Kathleen M.2,Cho Younki13,Riddick Stuart N.3,Zimmerle Daniel J.34,Duggan Aidan3

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA

2. 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA

3. 3The Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA

4. 4Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA

Abstract

Methane (CH4) leakage from natural gas (NG) pipelines poses an environmental, safety, and economic threat to the public. While previous leak detection and quantification studies focus on the aboveground infrastructure, the analysis of underground NG pipeline leak scenarios is scarce. Furthermore, no data from controlled release experiments have been published on the accuracy of methods used to (1) quantify emissions from an area source and (2) use these emissions to quantify the size of a subsurface leak. This proof-of-concept work uses CH4 mole fraction, as measured by a single gas sensor, as an input to a simple dispersion-based model (WindTrax) under ideal conditions (i.e., in a field) and compares the calculated emissions to the known controlled NG release rates. The aboveground and surface CH4 mole fractions were measured for 5 days at a field testbed using controlled underground release rates ranging from 0.08 to 0.52 kg hr–1 (3.83–24.94 ft3 hr–1). Results confirmed that the mean normalized CH4 mole fraction increases as the atmosphere transitions from the Pasquill–Gifford (PG) stability class A (extremely unstable) to G (extremely stable). The estimated surface CH4 emissions showed large temporal variability, and for the emission rates tested, at least 6 h of data are needed to have a representative estimate from subsurface pipeline leaks (±27% of the controlled release rate on average). The probability that the emission estimate is within ±50% of the controlled release rate (P±50%) is approximately 50% when 1 h of data is collected; the probability approaches 100% with 3–4 h of data. Findings demonstrate the importance of providing enough data over time for accurate estimation of belowground leak scenarios. By adopting the estimation method described in this study, operators can better estimate leakage rates and identify and repair the largest leaks, thereby optimizing annual greenhouse gas emissions reductions and improving public safety.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

Atmospheric Science,Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Ecology,Environmental Engineering,Oceanography

Reference56 articles.

1. Alvarez, RA, Pacala, SW, Winebrake, JJ, Chameides, WL, Hamburg, SP.2012. Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America109(17): 6435–6440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202407109.

2. Barkley, ZR, Lauvaux, T, Davis, KJ, Deng, A, Miles, NL, Richardson, SJ, Cao, Y, Sweeney, C, Karion, A, Smith, M, Kort, EA, Schwietzke, S, Murphy, T, Cervone, G, Martins, D, Maasakkers, JD.2017. Quantifying methane emissions from natural gas production in north-eastern Pennsylvania. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics17(22): 13941–13966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13941-2017.

3. Bonifacio, HF, Maghirang, RG, Razote, EB, Trabue, SL, Prueger, JH.2013. Comparison of AERMOD and WindTrax dispersion models in determining PM10 emission rates from a beef cattle feedlot. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association63(5): 545–556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2013.768311.

4. Brantley, HL, Thoma, ED, Squier, WC, Guven, BB, Lyon, D.2014. Assessment of methane emissions from oil and gas production pads using mobile measurements. Environmental Science & Technology48(24): 14508–14515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es503070q.

5. Campbell, LM, Campbell, MV, Epperson, D.1996. Methane emissions from the natural gas industry volume 9: Underground pipelines. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA/600/R-96/080i (NTIS PB97-143002). Available athttps://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?Lab=NRMRL&dirEntryId=115618. Accessed February 5, 2022.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3