Estimating methane emissions from underground natural gas pipelines using an atmospheric dispersion-based method
Author:
Tian Shanru1, Smits Kathleen M.2, Cho Younki13, Riddick Stuart N.3, Zimmerle Daniel J.34, Duggan Aidan3
Affiliation:
1. 1Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA 2. 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA 3. 3The Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA 4. 4Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Abstract
Methane (CH4) leakage from natural gas (NG) pipelines poses an environmental, safety, and economic threat to the public. While previous leak detection and quantification studies focus on the aboveground infrastructure, the analysis of underground NG pipeline leak scenarios is scarce. Furthermore, no data from controlled release experiments have been published on the accuracy of methods used to (1) quantify emissions from an area source and (2) use these emissions to quantify the size of a subsurface leak. This proof-of-concept work uses CH4 mole fraction, as measured by a single gas sensor, as an input to a simple dispersion-based model (WindTrax) under ideal conditions (i.e., in a field) and compares the calculated emissions to the known controlled NG release rates. The aboveground and surface CH4 mole fractions were measured for 5 days at a field testbed using controlled underground release rates ranging from 0.08 to 0.52 kg hr–1 (3.83–24.94 ft3 hr–1). Results confirmed that the mean normalized CH4 mole fraction increases as the atmosphere transitions from the Pasquill–Gifford (PG) stability class A (extremely unstable) to G (extremely stable). The estimated surface CH4 emissions showed large temporal variability, and for the emission rates tested, at least 6 h of data are needed to have a representative estimate from subsurface pipeline leaks (±27% of the controlled release rate on average). The probability that the emission estimate is within ±50% of the controlled release rate (P±50%) is approximately 50% when 1 h of data is collected; the probability approaches 100% with 3–4 h of data. Findings demonstrate the importance of providing enough data over time for accurate estimation of belowground leak scenarios. By adopting the estimation method described in this study, operators can better estimate leakage rates and identify and repair the largest leaks, thereby optimizing annual greenhouse gas emissions reductions and improving public safety.
Publisher
University of California Press
Subject
Atmospheric Science,Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Ecology,Environmental Engineering,Oceanography
Reference56 articles.
1. Alvarez, RA, Pacala, SW, Winebrake, JJ, Chameides, WL, Hamburg, SP.2012. Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America109(17): 6435–6440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202407109. 2. Barkley, ZR, Lauvaux, T, Davis, KJ, Deng, A, Miles, NL, Richardson, SJ, Cao, Y, Sweeney, C, Karion, A, Smith, M, Kort, EA, Schwietzke, S, Murphy, T, Cervone, G, Martins, D, Maasakkers, JD.2017. Quantifying methane emissions from natural gas production in north-eastern Pennsylvania. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics17(22): 13941–13966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13941-2017. 3. Bonifacio, HF, Maghirang, RG, Razote, EB, Trabue, SL, Prueger, JH.2013. Comparison of AERMOD and WindTrax dispersion models in determining PM10 emission rates from a beef cattle feedlot. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association63(5): 545–556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2013.768311. 4. Brantley, HL, Thoma, ED, Squier, WC, Guven, BB, Lyon, D.2014. Assessment of methane emissions from oil and gas production pads using mobile measurements. Environmental Science & Technology48(24): 14508–14515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es503070q. 5. Campbell, LM, Campbell, MV, Epperson, D.1996. Methane emissions from the natural gas industry volume 9: Underground pipelines. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA/600/R-96/080i (NTIS PB97-143002). Available athttps://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?Lab=NRMRL&dirEntryId=115618. Accessed February 5, 2022.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|