Comparing facility-level methane emission rate estimates at natural gas gathering and boosting stations

Author:

Vaughn Timothy L.1ORCID,Bell Clay S.1,Yacovitch Tara I.2,Roscioli Joseph R.2,Herndon Scott C.2,Conley Stephen34,Schwietzke Stefan56,Heath Garvin A.7,Pétron Gabrielle56,Zimmerle Daniel1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Colorado State University, Energy Institute and Mechanical Engineering, Fort Collins, Colorado, US

2. Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, Massachusetts, US

3. Department of Land, Air, and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, California, US

4. Scientific Aviation, Inc., Boulder, Colorado, US

5. University of Colorado Boulder, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, Colorado, US

6. NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, US

7. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, US

Abstract

Coordinated dual-tracer, aircraft-based, and direct component-level measurements were made at midstream natural gas gathering and boosting stations in the Fayetteville shale (Arkansas, USA). On-site component-level measurements were combined with engineering estimates to generate comprehensive facility-level methane emission rate estimates (“study on-site estimates (SOE)”) comparable to tracer and aircraft measurements. Combustion slip (unburned fuel entrained in compressor engine exhaust), which was calculated based on 111 recent measurements of representative compressor engines, accounts for an estimated 75% of cumulative SOEs at gathering stations included in comparisons. Measured methane emissions from regenerator vents on glycol dehydrator units were substantially larger than predicted by modelling software; the contribution of dehydrator regenerator vents to the cumulative SOE would increase from 1% to 10% if based on direct measurements. Concurrent measurements at 14 normally-operating facilities show relative agreement between tracer and SOE, but indicate that tracer measurements estimate lower emissions (regression of tracer to SOE = 0.91 (95% CI = 0.83–0.99), R2 = 0.89). Tracer and SOE 95% confidence intervals overlap at 11/14 facilities. Contemporaneous measurements at six facilities suggest that aircraft measurements estimate higher emissions than SOE. Aircraft and study on-site estimate 95% confidence intervals overlap at 3/6 facilities. The average facility level emission rate (FLER) estimated by tracer measurements in this study is 17–73% higher than a prior national study by Marchese et al.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

Atmospheric Science,Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology,Ecology,Environmental Engineering,Oceanography

Reference34 articles.

1. Response to Comment on “Methane Emissions from Process Equipment at Natural Gas Production Sites in the United States: Pneumatic Controllers.”;Environ Sci Technol,2015

2. Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States;Proc Natl Acad Sci,2013

3. Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies;J R Stat Soc Ser Stat,1983

4. Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure;Proc Natl Acad Sci,2012

5. Bacharach, Inc. 2015 HI FLOW® Sampler For Natural Gas Leak Rate Measurement. Bacharach, Inc. Available at: www.mybacharach.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/0055-9017-Rev-7.pdf Accessed 2016 Jun 5.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3