1. Some papers are set off following a casual, almost coincidental, chat. Such was this paper, which was written following a conversation over dinner with Prof. Maria Mavroudi. Her questions and comments clarified why and how it should be written, and encouraged me to do so. I wish to thank her for that valuable conversation. I also wish to thank my friends and colleagues for their comments: Prof. Caroline Humfress, Prof. Vered Noam, Prof. Thomas Graumann, Prof. Suzanne Last Stone, Dr. Benny Porat, Prof. Assaf Likhovski, Prof. Daphna Hacker and Ms. Amanda Dale. Above all, I wish to thank my mother, Mrs. Gila Monnickendam, who, as always, was my first reader and editor. Her thoughtful and thorough comments and corrections are embedded in every word of this paper, תנצב”ה. The paper was written with the support of the European Commission, Marie Curie, CIG. All errors remain, of course, my own.
2. For a recent example, see Arye Edrei and Doron Mendels, “Preliminary Thoughts on Structures of ‘Sovereignty’ and the Deepening Gap between Judaism and Christianity in the First Centuries CE,” Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha 23 (2014): 215–38, who compared the Jewish choice of law as a marker of identity and sovereignty with the Christian choice of theology as such a marker. See also the discussion of David Novak, “The End of the Law: A Significant Difference between Judaism and Christianity,” in Transforming Relations: Essays on Jews and Christians Throughout History in Honor of Michael A. Signer, ed. Franklin T. Harkins (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2010), 34–49, who pointed to the problems involved in tagging Christianity antinomic vs. Judaism as legalistic.
3. See, for example, Luke Timothy Johnson, “Law in Early Christianity,” in Christianity and Law, ed. John Witte and Frank S. Alexander (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), 53–69, which, as part of a companion on Christian law, is officially devoted to pre-Constantine Church law, yet focuses mostly on the New Testament. The article by Richard H. Helmholz, “Western Canon Law,” in ibid., 71–87, discusses the roots of Canon law, yet devotes just one page to late antique legal literature. Rémi Brague, The Law of God: The Philosophical History of an Idea, trans. Lydia G. Cochrane (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2007), 85–93, 127–45 portrays a similar picture in his introduction. Likewise, Clarence Gallagher, Church Law and Church Order in Rome and Byzantium (Birmingham Byzantine and Ottoman Monographs 8; Hants: Ashgate, 2002), sets out to describe Canon law in the first millennium, yet starts his study with sources from the sixth century. Similarly, see the earlier study of Constant van de Wiel, History of Canon Law (Louvain Theological & Pastoral Monographs 5; Louvain: Peeters Press, 1991), 22–55. Nevertheless, a few scholars have described early Canon law with emphasis not only on the New Testament but also on sources between the New Testament and the fourth century. See Ludwig Buisson, “Die Entstehung des Kirchenrechts,” Zeitschrift der Savigny Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Kanonistische Abteilung 52 (1966): 1–175; Othmar Heggelbacher, Geschichte des frühchristlichen Kirchenrechts bis zum Konzil von Nizäa 325 (Freiburg: Universitätsverlag, 1974).
4. For their listing see, for example, Jean Gaudemet, L’Église dans l'Empire romain: IVe–Ve siècles (Histoire du droit et des institutions de l’Église en occident 3; Paris: Sirey, 1958), 33–50; idem, Les sources du droit de l'Eglise en occident du IIe au VIIe siècle (Initiations au christianisme ancien; Paris: Editions du Cerf/Editions du C.N.R.S, 1985).
5. For the latest studies on the Didache, especially with regard to Jewish literature and halakhic traditions, see the collections of Huub van de Sandt, Matthew and the Didache: Two Documents from the Same Jewish-Christian Milieu? (Assen and Minneapolis: Royal Van Gorcum and Fortress Press, 2005); Jonathan Alfred Draper, The Didache in Modern Research (Leiden: Brill, 1996), and Clayton N. Jefford, The Didache in Context: Essays on Its Text, History and Transmission (Supplements to Novum Testamentum 77; Leiden, New York and Cologne: E. J. Brill, 1995), which include a review of scholarship, as well as specific studies on the halakhic aspects of the Didache.