Introduction to the Special Issue on Protest and Authoritarian Reaction in Belarus

Author:

Bekus Nelly1ORCID,Gabowitsch Mischa2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom

2. Research Center for the History of Transformations (RECET), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Abstract

Understanding the scale and nature of changes that have occurred in Belarus since the 2020 protests, not only at the political but also at the societal level, is crucial to our ability to interpret the role that Belarus has played in the current crisis in the region and to understand the potential for, and possible directions of, long-term change. This article provides interpretive frameworks for studying the Belarusian protests and their contribution to shaping new subjectivities in Belarusian society whose impact may go beyond altering state-society relations. The article reflects on relationality and eventfulness as key concepts for understanding shifts toward a consolidation of individuals’ autonomy from the state. It introduces the collection of articles in a special issue by reflecting on different disciplinary perspectives and approaches to the significance and aftermath of the 2020 protests, including new religious subjectivities, new emotional styles, and new gender roles. These articles provide sustenance for larger debates in the social sciences about the ways in which new subjectivities emerge in, refract through, and consolidate or dissipate after protest waves.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Development

Reference88 articles.

1. In Search of Agency: Examining Belarusian Society from Below;Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society,2017

2. Ackles, Devin. 2017. We Are Not Parasites: Understanding Belarus’s Protests. OpenDemocracy, March 3, 2017. Accessed June 22, 2023. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/understanding-belarus-s-protests

3. The Bitter End: Emotions at a Movement’s Conclusion;Sociological Inquiry,2003

4. Antonova, Natalia. 2021. “Forced Confessions Are the Propaganda of Terror.” Foreign Policy, June 14, 2021. Accessed June 22, 2023. https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/06/14/belarus-forced-confessions-lukashenko-protasevich

5. Authoritarian Cooptation of Civil Society: The Case of Belarus;Europe-Asia Studies,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3