Forging Frontline Russians

Author:

Bækken Håvard1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies, Oslo, Norway

Abstract

This article considers efforts by the de facto authorities of non-governmental-controlled areas (NGCAs) of eastern Ukraine to shape regional identity from 2014 through 2021. It focuses on the paradoxes of top-down identity construction in an environment of mixed popular sentiments, fluid borders, and an uncertain political future. It argues that nascent identity construction projects in the NGCAs were often inconsistent and unclear, emphasizing different layers of “candidate Fatherlands,” be it the individual self-declared republics, the Donbas, Novorossiia, the Russian Federation, or a broader Russian civilization. While internally inconsistent and contradictive, however, the various initiatives often took antemurale political myths as a point of departure. These myths spin around the idea that regional inhabitants constitute a particular brand of “frontline Russians”—hardened warriors protecting a western outpost of the Russian civilization. Even as “candidate Fatherlands” came and went, this ideational core manifested not only in policy and aloof declarations, but also in a persistent growth of so-called military-patriotic education in the region. Militarized ideas of political identity became mainstream within the occupied areas—reflecting both influences from Russia and the ongoing war.

Publisher

University of California Press

Reference50 articles.

1. Abibok, Yulia. 2018. “On the Way to Creating the ‘Donbas People.’ Identity Policy in the Self-Proclaimed Republics in East Ukraine.” Center for Eastern Studies, no. 270 (June). Accessed March 3, 2024. https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2018-06-06/identity-policy-self-proclaimed-republics-east-ukraine-0

2. Alava, Jonna. 2021. “Russia’s Young Army: Raising New Generations into Militarized Patriots.’” In Nexus of Patriotism and Militarism in Russia, edited by KatriPynnöniemi, 249–282. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. Accessed March 3, 2024. https://hup.fi/site/chapters/e/10.33134/HUP-9-9/

3. Alexeev, Mikhail. 2017. “A Poisoned Chalice. How the Minsk Accords Destabilize Ukraine.” Ponars Eurasia Policy Memo, no. 456 (February). Accessed March 3, 2024. https://www.ponarseurasia.org/a-poisoned-chalice-how-the-minsk-accords-destabilize-ukraine/

4. Allen, Duncan. 2020. “The Minsk Conundrum. Western Policy and Russia’s War in Eastern Ukraine.” Ukraine Forum. London: The Royal Institute for International Affairs. Accessed March 3, 2024. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/2020-05-22-minsk-conundrum-allan.pdf

5. Alting, B. G. 2018. “The DNA of the DNR: Legitimation Strategies of the Unrecognized ‘Donetsk People’s Republic.’” Master’s thesis, Leiden University.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3