Acceptability Semantics for Weighted Argumentation Frameworks-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Acceptability Semantics for Weighted Argumentation Frameworks

Published:2017-08 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:
Container-title:Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Amgoud Leila¹,Ben-Naim Jonathan¹,Doder Dragan²,Vesic Srdjan³

Affiliation:

1. IRIT, CNRS - Université de Toulouse

2. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade

3. CRIL, CNRS - Université d'Artois

Abstract

The paper studies semantics that evaluate arguments in argumentation graphs, where each argument has a basic strength, and may be attacked by other arguments. It starts by defining a set of principles, each of which is a property that a semantics could satisfy. It provides the first formal analysis and comparison of existing semantics. Finally, it defines three novel semantics that satisfy more principles than existing ones.

Publisher

International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Weighted knowledge bases with typicality and defeasible reasoning in a gradual argumentation semantics;Intelligenza Artificiale;2024-07-31

2. Temporal duration-based probabilistic argumentation frameworks;Journal of Logic and Computation;2024-07-31

3. Exploring Opinion Diversity and Epistemic Success with an Argumentative Model;Springer Proceedings in Complexity;2024

4. An Equivalence Class of Gradual Semantics;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2023-11-19

5. smProbLog: Stable Model Semantics in ProbLog for Probabilistic Argumentation;Theory and Practice of Logic Programming;2023-05-25