RDP 2014-2020 AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR SUPPORTING INNOVATIONS IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AREAS IN POLAND ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE MEASURE COOPERATION-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

RDP 2014-2020 AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR SUPPORTING INNOVATIONS IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AREAS IN POLAND ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE MEASURE COOPERATION

Published:2022-11-08 Issue:4 Volume:XXIV Page:225-238
ISSN:2657-781X
Container-title:Annals of the Polish Association of Agricultural and Agribusiness Economists
language:
Short-container-title:Annals PAAAE

Author:

Wojewódzka-Wiewiórska Agnieszka¹

Affiliation:

1. Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the level of support for innovation in agriculture and rural areas by RDP 2014-2020 on the example of the measure Cooperation (M16). Data from the Agency for Restructuring and Modernization of Agriculture (2021) were used. Based on the analysis of all projects implemented in Poland, the size of the allocation of funds was determined broken down into subsequent calls. The spatial differentiation at the regional and local level was indicated, and detailed directions of spending the funds were specified. In total, 334 projects were submitted in the 3 analyzed calls for proposals, of which 48.2% received financial support. The total amount of co-financing was PLN 448.19 million. The allocation of funds was spatially uneven, which is visible both at the regional and local levels. Taking into account the place of implementation of projects, the greatest amount of aid was spent in the Mazowieckie, Łódzkie and Kujawsko-Pomorskie voivodeships. In north-eastern and north-western Poland, most poviats did not support the development of innovation in agriculture and rural areas under measure M16. Most projects implemented under RDP 2014-2020 concerned poultry and cattle, then apples, pigs, herbs, beekeeping, hemp, support for supply chains, cereals and potatoes. Projects supporting the development of technological innovations dominated.

Publisher

Index Copernicus

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Link

https://rnseria.com/gicid/pdf/01.3001.0016.0807

Reference25 articles.

1. ARiMR (Agencja Restrukturyzacji i Modernizacji Rolnictwa, Agency for Restructuring and Modernization of Agriculture – ARMA). 2021. Dane według stanu na 10.06.2021 (Data as of June 10, 2021), https://www.gov.pl/web/arimr/program-rozwoju-obszarow-wiejskich-lata-2014-2020, access: 10.09.2022.

2. Bal-Woźniak Teresa. 2004. O podmiotowych uwarunkowaniach innowacyjności, czyli pierwotnych przyczynach braku aktywności innowacyjnej (About subjective determinants of innovation, that is about original reasons of the lack of innovation activity). Prace Naukowe Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu 1030: 19-24.

3. Brańka Patrycja. 2016. Innowacje na obszarach wiejskich na przykładzie inicjatyw podejmowanych przez lokalne grupy działania w woj. małopolskim (Innovation in rural areas on the example of the initiatives undertaken by Local Action Groups in Małopolskie Voivodeship). Studia KPZK 173: 125-135.

4. Brojak-Trzaskowska Małgorzata. 2007. Egzogeniczne stymulatory i ograniczenia aktywności innowacyjnej przedsiębiorstw jako przejawu przedsiębiorczości na przykładzie region zachodniopomorskiego (Exogenous stimulants and limitations of innovative activity of enterprises as a manifestation of entrepreneurship on the example of the West Pomeranian region). Zeszyty Naukowe. Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług 471 (11): 19-28.

5. CDR Brwinów. 2021. Finansowanie innowacji w rolnictwie w ramach PROW 2014-2020 (Financing innovation in agriculture under RDP 2014-2020). Instytut Technologiczno-Przyrodniczy w Falentach, Mazowiecki Ośrodek Badawczy w Kłudzienku, Centrum Doradztwa Rolniczego w Brwinowie, https://www.cdr.gov.pl/pol/SIR/SIR_/2015_11_03_koferencja/Fiansowanie%20innowacji%20w%20ramach%20dzia%C5%82ania%20Wsp%C3%B3%C5%82praca.pdf, access: 20.08.2021.