Foreign body within the upper esophagus of a patient not consenting to surgical treatment – case report and legal proceedings in light of current case law

Author:

Stępiński Mateusz1ORCID,Tymiński Radosław2,Hrydnova Valeriia1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Laryngology with Maxillofacial Surgery Subdivision, Regional Polyclinical Hospital in Gorzów Wielkopolski, Poland

2. Attorney-at-Law Firm Radosław Tymiński, Warsaw, Poland

Abstract

<b><br>Introduction:</b> Patients intentionally inserting foreign bodies into the lumen of their gastrointestinal tract usually aim at achieving certain benefits, such as postponement or avoidance of punishment.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> In view of the ever-increasing number of proceedings (including criminal proceedings) against health care professionals, the authors carried out a review of the available literature on: medical actions undertaken in cases of foreign bodies within the esophagus, current legislation and jurisprudence as practiced in the Republic of Poland within the context of model legal proceedings in cases involving patients raising doubts about being fully conscious and not consenting to necessary treatment.</br> <b><br>Case report:</b> The article presents a case of a patient with an esophageal foreign body who had not consented to the proposed surgical treatment. Doubts as raised within the otorhinolaryngological team with regard to the patient’s state of consciousness were not dispelled as the result of psychiatric consultation. Following a meticulous analysis of the current jurisprudence of the Polish judicial system and obtaining a court’s permission to intervene, the procedure (esophagoscopy with removal of esophageal foreign body) was performed. After exclusion of any life-threatening complications, the patient was transferred to the Psychiatric Department.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> In the current state of the law, performing a procedure to remove a foreign body from the esophagus without prior court approval could qualify as a violation of patient’s rights. In such case, legal liability of the physician would arise regardless of the fact that the patient would have received care in accordance with the current medical knowledge and practice.</br>

Publisher

Index Copernicus

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3