Affiliation:
1. Adam Mickiewicz University
Abstract
The article addresses the problem of identity and status of comparative education in contemporary science, as well as its developmental dynamics and scientific potential. In its first part, the author reconstructs the debate on the 'crisis' of comparative education and also the various avenues of its critique, especially, but not exclusively, in the context of its relationship with other (sub)disciplines. Part two focuses on the developmental dynamics of comparative education, against the background of the discussion regarding the various criteria and aspects of estimating the state of (sub)disciplines. Thus, the theoretical and methodological openness of comparative education and its responsiveness to social change will be presented. Furthermore, comparative education is placed in the context of the debate between essentialism and scientific constructivism, the problem of interdisciplinarity and research integration, the density paradox or the narcissism of small differences, as well as the challenge of postmodernism. The final section of the text presents the idea of a comparative educator as a traveller and its potential to transcend one's own epistemological script.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Reference53 articles.
1. Aldrich, J. H. (2014). Interdisciplinarity: Its Role in a Discipline-based Academy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Altbach P. G. (1991). Trends in Comparative Education. Comparative Education Review, 35(3), 491-507.
3. Auld, A., Morris, P. (2014) Comparative education, the ‘New Paradigm’ and policy borrowing: constructing knowledge for educational reform. Comparative Education, 50(2), 129-155.
4. Bauman, Z. (1988). Strangers: The Social Construction of Universality and Particularity. Telos, 78(7), Winter, 7-42.
5. Becher, T., Trowler, P. (2001). Academic Tribes And Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Buckingham: Open University Press.