Privacy on the Internet: An Empirical Study of Poles’ Attitudes

Author:

Mider Daniel1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Political Science and International Studies, University of Warsaw, Poland

Abstract

The value system of Poles in terms of the phenomenon of privacy on the Internet was analysed. The following aspects were taken into account: privacy on the Internet as a moral value, privacy on the Internet as a subject of legal regulations (current or future) and actual actions taken by users to protect privacy. The differentiation of Polish society in terms of the three above-mentioned areas was also examined. Results were obtained on the basis of a quantitative empirical study conducted on a representative sample (N=1001) of adult Poles. The method of computer assisted telephone interviews (CATI) was used. Descriptive statistics and selected inductive statistics were used in the analyses. Intra-group differentiation was investigated using a method called two-step cluster analysis. Poles have low technical competences in the field of Internet privacy protection. This value is appreciated; however, it rarely translates into active protection of one’s own identity and information. A strong polarization of Poles’ attitudes towards the requirement to disclose their identity on the Internet was identified, as well as ensuring access to any user information by law enforcement agencies. Poles are willing to accept legal regulations preventing their profiling. We note a moderately strong negative attitude towards state institutions as a factor limiting privacy on the Internet and a significantly lower (but still negative) attitude towards Internet service providers. Poles differ in terms of attitudes towards privacy on the Internet (IT competences, age, education, gender, socioeconomic status and size of the place of residence).

Publisher

NASK National Research Institute

Reference37 articles.

1. LeakLookup, Data Breach Search Engine. [Online]. Available: https://leak-lookup.com/. [Accessed: Oct. 28, 2022].

2. A. Florek, “The problems with PRISM: How a modern definition of privacy necessarily protects privacy interestsin digital communications,” UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law, vol. 30, no. 3, pp.571–606, 2014.

3. L. Rainie, J. Anderson. (2014). The Future of Privacy. [Online]. Available: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2014/12/18/future-of-privacy/. [Accessed: Oct. 29, 2022].

4. D. J. Solove, Understanding privacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.

5. H. Nissenbaum, Privacy in context: technology, policy, and integrity of social life. Stanford, CA: Stanford UniversityPress, 2010.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3