Dialogue as the basis for formative assessment

Author:

Nowosielska Edyta1

Affiliation:

1. Akademia Pedagogiki Specjalnej im. Marii Grzegorzewskiej w Warszawie

Abstract

The aim of the article is to show dialogue as the basis for formative assessment. We can look at formative assessment as one of the ways to support students in managing their learning process, where the interaction between the assessed and the evaluator as well as the openness and conversation of these two entities are important. Dialogue is a way to understanding and self-understanding, an important part of which is the feedback provided to students by the teacher. When giving feedback, the teacher must take care of the space for dialogue and remember that what is said is important, as well as how and in what relationships it is done. In the article, I pay special attention to dialogue, which is today the basic instrument of learning, it is a process in progress that never ends. In dialogue education, it is important not only to listen, but also to meet and interact with each other, during which specific meanings are built. Dialogue becomes the basis for formative assessment, and the mere provision of feedback to the student during the dialogue is essential in the teacher-student relationship, and vice versa. In this case, the role of the teacher who becomes a participant in the dialogue with the students, changes as well. In conclusion, I would like to point out that active participation in dialogue education changes the perspective of looking at feedback and puts it on an equal footing between the teacher and children, which lays the foundation for a new understanding of the child's role in learning and developing subjectivity, important for both sides of this dialogue.

Publisher

Index Copernicus

Subject

General Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. Arendt, H. (2000). Kondycja ludzka. Warszawa: Aletheia.

2. Bachtin, M. (1996). O metodologii literaturoznawstwa. W: H. Markiewicz (red.), Współczesna teoria badań literackich za granicą. Antologia (s 88–98). Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.

3. Barnes, D. (1988). Nauczyciel i uczniowie. Od porozumiewania się do kształcenia. Warszawa: WSiP.

4. Bałachowicz, J. (2009). Style działań edukacyjnych nauczycieli klas początkowych. Między uprzedmiotowieniem a podmiotowością. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo APS.

5. Black, P., William, D. (1998). Assesment and classrom learning, assesment in education. Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–73.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3