Affiliation:
1. Department of General Surgery, Seth GSMC & KEMH, Mumbai, India
Abstract
<b><br>Introduction:</b> Stoma surgery, which involves creating a diversion of the small intestine through an abdominal wall opening, poses challenges in managing fluid and electrolyte imbalances. Patients with high proximal stoma often rely on costly and risky parenteral nutrition (PN). Distal enteral tube feeding, a method of delivering nutrition to the small intestine, is intended to improve clinical outcomes and reduce complications. This study presents a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between postoperative distal enteral tube refeeding and traditional enteral and PN approaches in stoma patients with distal mucous fistula.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> To evaluate the effectiveness of distal enteral tube refeeding in improving postoperative outcomes after stoma surgery and to examine the impact of distal enteral tube refeeding on total hospitalization stay, ICU length of stay, TPN duration, and time to closure of the stoma.</br> <b><br>Material and methods:</b> The study is a retrospective, single-center trial involving 84 patients who had undergone stoma surgery. The patients were divided into two groups: those receiving postoperative distal enteral tube refeeding (n = 42) and the control group (n = 42), with standard mucous fistula creation. The data was collected retrospectively from January 2012 to January 2022 and the statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, the chi-square test, and the t-test.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> The results of our study show that the patients who had undergone postoperative distal enteral tube refeeding had a significantly shorter total hospitalization stay (p = 0.0002), a significantly shorter ICU length of stay (p = 0.0006), a significantly shorter TPN duration (p= 0.0004), and a significantly faster time to closure (p = 0.0002).</br>
Reference12 articles.
1. Ma H., Li X., Yang H., Qiu Y., Xiao W.: The Pathology and Physiology of Ileostomy. Front Nutr., 2022; 9: 842198. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.842198.
2. Murken D.R., Bleier J.I.S.: Ostomy-Related Complications. Clin Colon RectalSurg. 2019; 32(3): 176–182. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676995.
3. Toningerová V., Frýba V.: Modern trends in management of complicated gastrointestinal ostomies. Cas Lek Cesk., 2021; 160(5): 193–202.
4. Carlsson E., Fingren J., Hallén A.M., Petersén C., Lindholm E.: The Prevalenceof Ostomy-related Complications 1 Year After Ostomy Surgery: A Prospective, Descriptive, Clinical Study. Ostomy Wound Manage., 2016; 62(10): 34–48.
5. Dilke S.M., Gould L., Yao M. et al.: Distal feeding-bowel stimulation to treatshort-term or long-term pathology: a systematic review. Frontline Gastroenterol., 2020; 12(7): 677–682. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2019-101359.