Gender-related differences in kinematic parameters of the start and performance in a 50m breaststroke swimming

Author:

Matúš Ivan1ORCID,Ružbarský Pavel1ORCID,Vadašová Bibiana1ORCID,Eliaš Tomáš1ORCID,Czarny Wojciech1ORCID,Němá Kristína1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Sports, University of Presov, Slovakia

Abstract

Introduction: In swimming, the competitions are divided by age categories, with each swimming event beginning at the start. For optimal improvements in swimming performance in the sprint events, the performance at the start and during swimming in each age category should be analyzed. Aim: The aim of our study is to show the differences in kinematic parameters of the start and performance in the sprint event of 50 m breaststroke from the perspective of gender in different age groups at international competitions organized in Slovakia. Materials and Methods: The females were categorized by age into K3 (2010-2011; n=36; 282 WA points), K2 (2008-2009; n=26; 409 WA points) and K1 (2007 and older; n=34; 503 WA points) groups. Males were categorized into K3 (2009-2010; n=27; 265 WA points), K2 (2007-2008; n=33; 372 WA points) and K1 (2006 and older; n=39; 207 WA points) groups. We used SwimPro cameras and Dartgish software to monitor kinematic parameters in the above-water, underwater, and swim phases. The parameters monitored were block time (BT), time (FT), and length (FD) of flight, time (UWT) and length (UWD) underwater, swim time (ST) and distance (SD) to 15 m, time to 15 m (T15), 25 m (T25), and 50 m (T50) distance. Data were tested by Shapiro-Wilk, Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, and Mann-Whitney U test in Statistica software (version 13.5). Results: Statistically significant differences (p<0.01) in females were found in the above-water phase in BT, FT, and FD between K3 and K1. The underwater phase in UWT showed differences between K3 to K1, K2 to K1 whereas for UWD - between K3 and K2 and between K2 and K1. For T15 and T25, there were differences (p<0.01) between all categories, but in the final time (T50), the differences occurred between K3 and K2 and between K3 and K1. In males, there was a significant difference in the above-water phase between K3 and K1 and between K2 and K1. In UWD, ST, SD, T15, T25, and T50, there were significant differences between all categories. Differences (p>0.01) between males and females by category in the above-water phase were measured in FT (K1) and FD (K2, K1). In the underwater phase, the differences were found in UWT (K2) and UWD (K1). For T15, T25, and T50, significant differences were shown in all categories. Conclusions: The kinematic analysis revealed differences not only in the start phases and the 50 m breaststroke swimming in the male and female categories but also between genders. Differences in swimming performance may be due to performance at the start and therefore more attention should be paid to the start phases in the different categories of swimmers.

Publisher

Index Copernicus

Reference28 articles.

1. Gonjo T, Olstad BH. Start and turn performance of competitive swimmer in sprint butterfly swimming. Journal sports science and medicine, 2020;19(4): 727 -734.

2. Tor E, Pease D, Ball K. Key parameters of the swimming start and their relationship to start performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 2015;33(13): 1313-21. doi:10.1080/02640414.2014.990486.

3. Garcia-Hermoso A, Escalante Y, Arellano R, Navarro F, Dominguez AM, Saavedra JM. Relationship between final performance and block times with the traditional and the new starting platforms with a back plate in international swimming championship 50-m and 100-m freestyle events. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2013;12(4): 698-706.

4. Tor E, Pease D, Ball K. Characteristics of an elite swimming start. In B. Mason (Ed.), XIIth International Symposium on Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming, 2014;257- 263. Canberra, Australia Australian Institute of Sport.

5. Detanico D, Heidorn SI, Dal Pupo J, Diefenthaeler F, dos Santos SG. Kinematical and neuromuscular aspect related to performance during the swimming start. Portuguese Journal of Sport Science, 2011;11(2): 199-201.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3