Evaluation of oxidant-antioxidant balance and DNA
damage in blood of patients with cancer of the
head and neck under the influence of copper(II)
complex: Preliminary studies
-
Published:2020-09-22
Issue:
Volume:74
Page:382-390
-
ISSN:0032-5449
-
Container-title:Postępy Higieny i Medycyny Doświadczalnej
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Postepy Hig Med Dosw
Author:
Malinowska Katarzyna1, Morawiec-Sztandera Alina2, Majczyk Małgorzata2, Kaczmarczyk Dariusz3, Merecz-Sadowska Anna4, Zajdel Radosław4, Zielinska-Blizniewska Hanna1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Allergology and Respiratory Rehabilitation, 2nd Chair of Otolaryngology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland 2. Department of Head and Neck Neoplasms Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland 3. Department of Human Physiology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland 4. Department of Economic Informatics, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
Abstract
Introduction: The primary aim of this research was to evaluate the oxidative stress markers and the level
of oxidative DNA damage in the pathogenesis of head and neck cancer.
Materials/Methods: Sixty-two subjects matched for age and gender, including 31 patients with head and neck
cancer and 31 control patients without cancer symptoms, were enrolled in our study. In our
work, the activity of antioxidant enzymes: catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and
glutathione peroxidase (GPX), as well as a total antioxidant status (TAS), were estimated.
Additionally, an alkaline comet assay was used to measure the level of DNA damage in the
group of patients with head and neck cancer and the group of healthy control patients. These
tests were performed on a blood sample with and without prior incubation of dinitratebis
(1-phenyl-5-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-N1pyrazol-κN2)cooper(II).
Results: Significant increases of SOD, GPX CAT, TAS (P <0.001) were seen in blood from patients with
head and neck cancer and prior incubation of cooper (II) component compared to blood from
healthy controls without prior incubation of analyzed chemical. Moreover, we did not observe
any relationship between the level of DNA damage and the studied component dinitratebis
(1-phenyl-5-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-3-methyl-N1pyrazol-κN2)cooper(II) in the group of patients
with head and neck cancer or in healthy controls.
Discussion: Free radicals such as reactive oxygen species, which induce oxidative stress, may contribute
to head and neck carcinogenesis. Therefore, we suggest that modulation of pro-oxidant
/antioxidant status might be a relevant target for both prevention and therapy.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical)
Reference49 articles.
1. Alsahafi E., Begg K., Amelio I., Raulf N., Lucarelli P., Sauter T.,Tavassoli M.: Clinical update on head and neck cancer: Molecularbiology and ongoing challenges. Cell Death Dis., 2019; 10: 540 2. Beers R.F. Jr, Sizer I.W.: A spectrophotometric method for measuringthe breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. J. Biol.Chem., 1952; 195: 133–140 3. Bonomi M., Patsias A., Posner M., Sikora A.: The role of inflammationin head and neck cancer. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 2014; 816:107–127 4. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., JemalA.: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidenceand mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA CancerJ. Clin., 2018; 68: 394–424 5. Challen C., Brown H., Cai C., Betts G., Paterson I., Sloan P., WestC., Birch-Machin M., Robinson M.: Mitochondrial DNA mutationsin head and neck cancer are infrequent and lack prognostic utility.Br. J. Cancer, 2011; 104: 1319–1324
|
|