Opioid-free anaeshtesia in gynecology, future or a step back? –systematic review

Author:

Sikorski Maksymilian1,Górski Wojciech Jan1,Czesak Karol1

Affiliation:

1. Wydział Medyczny, Collegium Medicum, Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie, Polska

Abstract

Gynecological operations are surgical procedures involving the pelvic organs of a woman. They are divided into:laparoscopic, laparotomy and from vaginal access. The first two types are performed under general anesthesiawith opioids (Opioid Based Anasthesia, OBA). However, due to many side effects of opioids, non-opioid anesthesia(Opioid Free Anasthesia, OFA) has become more widely used. The following review focuses on the comparisonof postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, recovery quality, nausea and vomiting (PONV), hypotension andbradycardia between these two therapeutic approaches. The aim of this study is to perform comparative analysis ofthe effectiveness and side effects in gynecological surgeries using the OFA or OBA procedure. Review was performedwith MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED databeses and the Cochrane Library, between September 2023 and December 2023.Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing efficacy and side effects between OFA and OBA were included. Thereview comprised 498 patients from 6 RCTs. Common interventions included laparoscopic procedures. Evidence showsa reduction in side effects in OFA. PONV frequency was reduced in OFA (RR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.29–0.93; p = 0.004;l2 = 67.5%). The score on the recovery quality questionnaire was also significantly higher (mean difference +28.36 points/200). The difference in pain, frequency of hypotension and bradycardia slightly favors OFA, but these changeswere not statistically significant. OFA procedure is not only an effective alternative to OBA in gynecological surgery, butalso improves the outcomes after it. Although, further research in this field is required.

Publisher

Index Copernicus

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3