Enforcement of imprisonment sentences of the International Criminal Court

Author:

Matusiak Michał

Abstract

The paper presented above aims to present methods of enforcement of deprivation of liberty sentenced by the International Criminal Court. Roots of this problem are connected to international specific of the tribunal, which does not dispose its own penitentiary system. According to that, international tribunals are forced to use prisons of states, parties to the agreements establishing court. Aiming to define adopted model, article includes analysis of the key international acts for organization and proceeding of International Criminal Court and model of international agreement, adopted in case of will of state to accept sentenced. Moreover, there is analysis of judgement of International Criminal Court to describe experience of court in such issue. For presentation of evolution of the international law article shows also historical ways of enforcing sentences of imprisonment, adjudicated by Nuremberg Tribunal or tribunals ad hoc. Such analysis leads to conclusion, that there is some kind of model of the enforcing of prison sentenced by international tribunals and it has changed in some way. It is necessary to notice tendency, which are present and whish established actual model. Analysis presents that state, party to the Rome Statute is not automatically obliged to accept sentenced, but this decision is individual and it demands double approval of state, first one general and second one in case.

Publisher

Index Copernicus

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Surfaces, Coatings and Films

Reference96 articles.

1. Abtahi H., Koh S., The Emerging Enforcement Practice of the International Criminal, “Court Cornell International Law Journal” 2012, Vol. 45, Issue 1.

2. Akhavan P., The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda: The Politics and Pragmatics of Punishment, “The American Journal of International Law” 1996, Vol. 90, No. 3.

3. Barnes G., The International Criminal Court’s Ineffective Enforcement Mechanisms: The Indictment of President Omar Al Bashir, “Fordham International Law Journal” 2011, Vol. 34, Issue 6.

4. Bassiouni C., Chronology of Efforts to Establish an International Criminal Court, “Revue Internationale de Droit Penal” 2015, Vol. 86, No 3.

5. Becker S., The objections of larger nations to the international criminal court, „Revue Internationale de Droit Penal” 2010, Vol. 81, no 1.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3