Efficacy comparison of two methods for determining the position of the rebate edge (formed after MDF machining) during automatic monitoring of workpiece delamination

Author:

Śmietańska Katarzyna1ORCID,Górski Jarosław1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW Faculty of Wood Technology Department of Mechanical Processing of Wood

Abstract

Delamination is one of the most common defects in the processing of wood-based materials. It has a massive impact on the quality of the final product. In order to determine the delamination indicators simply and reliably, the automatic image processing method can be used (Śmietańska et al., 2020). Bator and Śmietańska (2019) proposed a special algorithm to estimate the straight line representing a milling edge. However, this algorithm is quite complicated. The aim of this article is to check whether the aforementioned (complicated) algorithmic way can be replaced by a much simpler idea – the precise manual positioning of the scanned sample on a scanner (using a very simple device installed on the scanner). Special experimental research was carried out to compare the effectiveness of the two different methods. The straight line representing the rebate edge identified by the Bator and Śmietańska (2019) algorithm was usually accurate to 1 pixel (0.02 mm). Based on the assumption that the scanned samples were perfectly positioned on the scanner, the analogue line only sometimes fit just as well. At worst, the distance between these lines is 0.2 mm. Usually, the distance did not exceed 0.16 mm but it was significant and quite random. There was no statistically significant correlation between this parameter (Dmax) and tool condition (VB). It means that the samples were not perfectly positioned. They were placed, more or less, in the same position because of the imperfect stiffness of the frame installed on the scanner and human errors.

Publisher

Index Copernicus

Subject

General Medicine

Reference9 articles.

1. BATOR M., ŚMIETAŃSKA K., 2019: Constraint-based algorithm to estimate the line of a milling edge. Machine Graphics and Vision 28(1/4): 59–67

2. LEMASTER R. L., LU L., JACKSON S., 2000: The use of process monitoring techniques on a CNC wood router. Part 2. Use of a vibration accelerometer to monitor tool wear and workpiece quality. Forest Products Journal 50(9): 59–64

3. PALANIKUMAR K., PRAKASH S., MANOHARAN N., 2009: Experimental investigation and analysis on delamination in drilling of wood composite medium density fiber boards. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 24(12): 1341–1348

4. PRAVEN R. P., ELAYA P., 2013: A prediction of delamination in end milling of GFRP using ANSYS. East Asian Science Technology and Society an International Journal AIJSTPME 6(2): 39–46

5. ROMOLI L., DINI G., 2008: Experimental study on the influence of drill wear in CFRP drilling process. Proceedings of: 6th CIRP International Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering, July 23-25 2008, Naples: 145–149

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3