ON BEING A COUPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES: BEYOND INCLUSION / ON MARGINS OF INCLUSIVE PRACTICES

Author:

Krzemińska Dorota1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Gdansk Faculty of Social Sciences Department of Special Pedagogy

Abstract

In the article I want to show some chosen results of the qualitative microetnographic study devoted to the phenomenon of being a couple of persons with intellectual disabilities in reference to (mimicry and hybridity as categories of ) Homi K. Bhabha’s postcolonial theory and then confront a contemporary situation of couples with intellectual disabilities four years after the publication stated demands of the microetnographic research project The microetnograpic study highlighted that being a couple is vividly present in this social group, appearing a very important/crucial life experience for women and men with intellectual disabilities, which however still lacks the interest in women and men with intellectual disabilities as couples, particularly in practical offers which could be described as one of the aspects of support of the group in question. Couples of persons with intellectual disabilities remain identified to belong to a segregated and marginalized group, facing barriers and/ or limits in access to the fields of social and life experiences connected with (intimate) relationships, love and care, mutual emotional relationships and support, acting as a partner, spouse, parent. They run the risk to continue exclusion resulting from discriminatory and depriving routine (or failure) of social welfare/ support system planners and policy builders (policy makers, lawmakers), as well as program designers responsible for services for adults with intellectual disabilities, daily activities and personal assistance. In order to see if/ or what has changed after four years after the publication of the results and stated demands of the microetnographic research project I have reviewed and analyzed a found data/secondary data/ sources / source materials, both academic publications and popularizing materials or newspaper articles that tackle the issue of relationships, couples and love between persons with intellectual disabilities. The analysis of the selected secondary sources makes it possible to conclude that couples of people with intellectual disabilities and the formation of relationships remain a long-standing and enduring phenomenon, which however, has not yet gained recognition, especially in the field of existing and/or projected offers of support for adults with intellectual disabilities. Couples remain excluded from professional support and assistance and therefore exist on the margins of inclusive practices.

Publisher

Index Copernicus

Reference17 articles.

1. Angrosino, M. V. (2010). Badania etnograficzne i obserwacyjne. Trans. By M. Brzozowska- Brywczyńska. Warszawa: PWN.

2. Babbie, E. (2003). Badania społeczne w praktyce. Trans. By W. Betkiewicz i in., red nauk. A. Kłosowska-Dudińska, Warszawa: PWN.

3. Bhabha, Homi K. (2010). Miejsca kultury. Trans. by T. Dobrogoszcz. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego,

4. Charmaz, K. (2009). Teoria ugruntowana. Warszawa: PWN

5. Hammersley, M., Atkinson, P. (2000). Metody badań terenowych. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3