Terrorism in the literature of the 1970s.Has the old axis of the dispute remained valid?

Author:

Bobkier Robert1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Abraham & Ben Hadar Law and Audit

Abstract

The 1970s are referred to as the “golden age” of terrorism. In this decade, it tookon an international character and links between terrorist groups from different countriesbegan to form. In the literature of that period, as well as now, the difficultiesassociated with building a uniform definition of the phenomenon of terrorism wereemphasized, as well as the practice of supporting it by the countries of the communist bloc. At the same time, the first classifications of sources of financing terrorism weremade, including mainly state sponsorship, donations and criminal activity. The axisof the dispute in the literature of the discussed decade was the attitude of individualauthors to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and all assessments of the phenomenonof terrorism were a derivative of views on this issue. However, this state of affairs wasnot specific only to the 1970s. This dispute has survived to this day, taking the formof a debate on the phenomenon of the so-called “Islamophobia.” In the course of thisdebate, some authors question not only Israel’s policy towards the Palestinians, butalso the legitimacy of the “global war on terrorism” conducted after 2001 by Westerncountries. This article is an expression of unequivocal condemnation of the views presentin some of the literature that actually justify terrorism, and especially those views thatfalsely equate the phenomenon of the so-called “Islamophobia” with anti-Semitism.The discrepancy of opinion on terrorism, revealed already in the 1970s, is a permanentelement of the discourse on this matter to this day.

Publisher

Index Copernicus

Reference128 articles.

1. Antczak A., Separatyzm baskijski, „Sprawy Narodowościowe” 2010, nr 37.

2. Aust S., Der Baader-Meinhof-Komplex, Goldmann, München 2010.

3. Bainczyk M., Ochrona przyrodzonej godności człowieka a ustawy „antyterrorystyczne”, „Państwo i Społeczeństwo” 2008, nr 3.

4. Bassiouni M. C, Methodological Options for International Legal Control of Terrorism, „Akron Law Review” 1977, nr 3.

5. Bazeli B., Dlaczego prognozy ekonomiczne są nietrafne?, „Roczniki Ekonomiczne Kujawsko- -Pomorskiej Szkoły Wyższej w Bydgoszczy” 2017, nr 10.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3