Referral to a probation centre as an educational measure

Author:

Stasiak Krzysztof1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. adiunkt w Katedrze Prawa Karnego Materialnego i Kryminologii Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego

Abstract

Referral to a probation centre is an educational measure that is adjudicated on average against 2% of juveniles. It is most often applied to juveniles who show behavior indicative of their demoralization (in about 70%). In the context of the changes that have taken place in the phenomenon of social maladjustment (an increase in the behaviors of juveniles that are indicative of their demoralization; in 2020, in 56% this was the reason for applying educational measures to them), referring a minor to a probation center appears to be one of the better means of influencing a minor, as the centre is a facility that has extensive experience in working with demoralized persons. This argues for further development of probation centres, both in organizational and methodical spheres. The new Act on the Support and Re-socialisation of Juveniles, which replaced the Act on the Proceedings in Juvenile Matters, modifies the basic purpose of a probation centre and transforms it from a primarily preventive facility into a typical educational and re-socialisation facility. The proposed changes go in the right direction, as they strengthen probation centres in organisational terms. However, it is questionable whether it is appropriate for this Act to regulate the rules for the creation, abolition and organisation of the centre, as these issues are of a systemic nature. A probation centre is undoubtedly an element of the probation service, for which reason the Probation Officers Act seems a more appropriate place to regulate such issues.

Publisher

Index Copernicus

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Surfaces, Coatings and Films

Reference34 articles.

1. Bojarski T., Postpowanie w sprawach nieletnich. Komentarz, Warszawa 2016.

2. Bojarski T., Pozytywne strony rozwiza ustawy o postpowaniu w sprawach nieletnich z 26 padziernika 1982 roku, Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 2004, nr 3.

3. C. Campistol, M. F. Aebi, Are juvenile criminal justice statistics comparable across countries? A study of the data available in 45 European nations, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 2018, 24, s. 55-78, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-017-9345-2.

4. Grecki P., Konarska-Wrzosek V., Postpowanie w sprawach nieletnich. Komentarz, Warszawa 2015.

5. Grzekowiak A., Prawo nieletnich, Warszawa 2020.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3