Biomarkers of myocardial injury in big laboratory data

Author:

Kozierkiewicz Adam1ORCID,Bielecka-Dąbrowa Agata2ORCID,Wojtyniak Bogdan3ORCID,Solnica Bogdan4ORCID,Banach Maciej5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. JASPERS, EIB, Warszawa, Polska

2. Klinika Kardiologii i Wad Wrodzonych Dorosłych, Instytut "Centrum Zdrowia Matki Polki", Łódź, Polska

3. Zakład Monitorowania i Analiz Stanu Zdrowia Ludności, Narodowy Instytut Zdrowia Publicznego PZH – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Warszawa, Polska

4. Zakład Diagnostyki Katedry Biochemii Klinicznej, Uniwersytet Jagielloński Collegium Medicum, Kraków, Polska

5. Zakład Kardiologii Prewencyjnej i Lipidologii, Uniwersytet Medyczny w Łodzi, Polska

Abstract

<br><b>Introduction:</b> In one of the research projects implemented under the National HealthProgramme, an analysis of the so-called “real world data” (RWD) was performed, regardingthe use of cardiac troponins carried out in the years 2014-2019 in the laboratories of one of the leading network diagnostic companies. The cardiac troponins T and I (cTnT and cTnI), including high-sensitivity cTnI (hs cTnI) were analyzed.</br><br><b>Aim:</b> The aim of the study was to evaluate usability of routinely collected data from laboratorytest to assess the health status of the population.</br><br><b>Results:</b> The results of the analysis showed a systematic growth of number of tests; in 2018(the last full year of observation) it was 216,000: from which cTnT tests accounted for about70%, cTnI and hs cTnI accounted for about 30%. At that time, there was a clear technologicalshift in troponin I research towards highly sensitive hs cTnI tests (27% in 2019). Due to thequality and recording of data, the results of the tests could only be analyzed in the caseof troponin T. In this category, approximately 60% revealed incorrect results; in the case ofwomen, this percentage was lower and amounted to 55% on average, and 65% for men.</br><br><b>Conclusions:</b> Observations made during the analysis indicate the need for greaterstandardization of information on laboratory tests, especially in the context of the introductionof Electronic Medical Records (EDM) and recent initiatives of Digital Medicine Centres.</br>

Publisher

Index Copernicus

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3