Abstract
Understood as being nothing more than fallible assumptions about the boundary conditions of an inquisitive worldview, this article seeks to argue that metaphysics and theology can, in fact, be pursued as a scientific endeavor. If we broaden our understanding of how perceived realities furnish feedback in order to refine preestablished human discourses, Ruist (Confucian) metaphysics and theology especially can be recognized as being historically pursued as a science by its own right. Eventually, the distinction of Western and Ruist traditions of metaphysics and theology, as well as the imperfections in each of them, speaks to the need of mutual learning for constructing a more robust metaphysical worldview in the twenty-first century.
Reference12 articles.
1. Antoci, Peter M. “Theology, Metaphysics, and Science: Twenty-First Century Hermeneutical Allies, Strangers, or Enemies?” Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry 1, no. 2 (Fall 2019): 226‒39. https://doi.org/10.33929/sherm.2019.vol1.no2.06.
2. Aquinas, Thomas. Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera Omnia. Leonine ed. Translated by Robert T. Miller. Vol. 43. Rome: Editori di San Tommaso, 1976.
3. Cheng, Hao and Cheng Yi. 二程集 [Works of Cheng Brothers]. Beijing: Zhong Hua Shu Ju, 1981.
4. Longxi, Wang. 王龍溪先生全集 [A Complete Work of Master Wang Longxi]. Vol. 卷. 會稽: 會稽莫氏, 道光2年.
5. Luo, Qinshun. 困知記 [Records of Knowing after Difficulties]. Beijing: Zhong Hua Shu Ju, 1990.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Sublating Sinic Relationism;Asian Studies;2022-09-02
2. Is Metaphysics a Science?;Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry;2019-08-21