Affiliation:
1. University of California, Irvine
Abstract
The problem of evil is the philosophical question regarding how to reconcile the existence of an omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient God with the pain and suffering in the world. The Hypothesis of Indifference is Paul Draper’s proposal considering that question. His claim is that the pain and pleasure we experience in our lifetimes has nothing to do with God or some other supernatural force acting as an agent of good or evil. In this paper, I argue that Draper’s Hypothesis of Indifference is a better explanation for why we experience pain and pleasure than theism is and that it survives major contemporary criticisms posed by Peter van Inwagen and William Alston.
Reference13 articles.
1. Alston, William P. “The Inductive Argument from Evil and the Human Cognitive Condition.” Philosophical Perspectives. Vol. 5 (1991): 29‒67.
2. Bayes, Thomas. “An Essay Towards Solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Vol. 53 (1763): 370‒418. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1763.0053.
3. Draper, Paul. “Pain and Pleasure: An Evidential Problem for Theists.” Noûs. Vol. 23, no. 3 (1989): 331‒50.
4. Draper, Paul. “The Skeptical Theist.” In The Evidential Argument from Evil. Edited by Daniel Howard-Snyder, 175‒92. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1996.
5. Hick, John. “Soul Making and Suffering.” In Evil and the God of Love, 255‒61. Tallahassee, FL: Harper and Rowe Publishers, 1996.