Identifying the Conflict between Religion and Science

Author:

Johnson David Kyle1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. King’s College, PA

Abstract

Inspired by Stephen J. Gould’s NOMA thesis, it is commonly maintained among academic theists (and some atheists) that religion and science are not in conflict. This essay will argue, by analogy, that science and religion undeniably are in conflict. It will begin by quickly defining religion and science and then present multiple examples that are unquestionable instances of unscientific reasoning and beliefs and show how they precisely parallel common mainstream orthodox religious reasoning and doctrines. It will then consider objections. In essence, this article will show that religion and science conflict when religion encroaches into the scientific domain. But in closing, it will show that they might also conflict when science encroaches into domains traditionally reserved for religion.

Publisher

The FaithX Project

Reference33 articles.

1. Allen, John L. Jr. “Vatican Announces May 1 Beatification for John Paul II.” National Catholic Reporter (blog), January 14, 2011. https://www.ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/vatican-announces-may-1-beatification-john-paul-ii.

2. Baker, Mark, and Stewart Goetz, eds. The Soul Hypothesis: Investigations Into the Existence of the Soul. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group, 2010.

3. Bennett, Drake. “Islam’s Darwin Problem: In the Muslim World, Creationism is on the Rise.” Boston Globe, October 25, 2009. http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2009/10/25/in_the_muslim_world_creationism_is_on_the_rise/

4. Cadge, Wendy. “Saying Your Prayers, Constructing Your Religions: Medical Studies of Intercessory Prayer.” The Journal of Religion 89, no. 3 (2009): 299‒327. http://doi.org/10.1086/597818.

5. Cavin, Robert Greg, and Carlos A. Colombetti. “The Implausibility and Low Explanatory Power of the Resurrection Hypothesis—With a Rejoinder to Stephen T. Davis.” Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry 2, no. 1 (Spring 2020): 37‒94. https://doi.org/10.33929/sherm.2020.vol2.no1.04.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Midnight Mass as Philosophy: The Problems with Religion;The Palgrave Handbook of Popular Culture as Philosophy;2024

2. On Angels, Demons, and Ghosts: Is Justified Belief in Spiritual Entities Possible?;Religions;2022-06-29

3. Midnight Mass as Philosophy: The Problems with Religion;The Palgrave Handbook of Popular Culture as Philosophy;2022

4. Reading Sacred Texts;GCRR Press;2021-02-05

5. Faith and Epistemology: Religious Truth Claims and Epistemic Warrant;Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry;2020-03-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3