Abstract
Inspired by Stephen J. Gould’s NOMA thesis, it is commonly maintained among academic theists (and some atheists) that religion and science are not in conflict. This essay will argue, by analogy, that science and religion undeniably are in conflict. It will begin by quickly defining religion and science and then present multiple examples that are unquestionable instances of unscientific reasoning and beliefs and show how they precisely parallel common mainstream orthodox religious reasoning and doctrines. It will then consider objections. In essence, this article will show that religion and science conflict when religion encroaches into the scientific domain. But in closing, it will show that they might also conflict when science encroaches into domains traditionally reserved for religion.
Reference33 articles.
1. Allen, John L. Jr. “Vatican Announces May 1 Beatification for John Paul II.” National Catholic Reporter (blog), January 14, 2011. https://www.ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/vatican-announces-may-1-beatification-john-paul-ii.
2. Baker, Mark, and Stewart Goetz, eds. The Soul Hypothesis: Investigations Into the Existence of the Soul. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group, 2010.
3. Bennett, Drake. “Islam’s Darwin Problem: In the Muslim World, Creationism is on the Rise.” Boston Globe, October 25, 2009. http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2009/10/25/in_the_muslim_world_creationism_is_on_the_rise/
4. Cadge, Wendy. “Saying Your Prayers, Constructing Your Religions: Medical Studies of Intercessory Prayer.” The Journal of Religion 89, no. 3 (2009): 299‒327. http://doi.org/10.1086/597818.
5. Cavin, Robert Greg, and Carlos A. Colombetti. “The Implausibility and Low Explanatory Power of the Resurrection Hypothesis—With a Rejoinder to Stephen T. Davis.” Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry 2, no. 1 (Spring 2020): 37‒94. https://doi.org/10.33929/sherm.2020.vol2.no1.04.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献