Abstract
Abstract
Gauss’ and Stokes’ theorems are fundamental results in vector calculus and important tools in physics and engineering. When students are asked to describe the meaning of Gauss’ divergence theorem, they often use statements like this: ‘The sum of all sources of a vector field in a region gives the net flux out of the region’. In order to raise this description to a mathematically sound level of understanding, we present an educational approach based on the visual interpretation of the vector differential operators, i.e. divergence and curl. As a starting point, we use simple vector field diagrams for a qualitative approach to connect both sides of the integral theorems, and present an interactive graphical tool to support this connection. The tool allows to visualise two-dimensional vector fields, to specify vector decomposition, to evaluate divergence and curl point wise, and to draw rectangles to determine surface and line integrals. From a meta-perspective, we situate this educational approach into learning with (multiple) representations. Based on prior research, the graphical tool addresses various learning difficulties of vector fields that are connected to divergence and curl. The tool was incorporated into the weekly lecture-based recitations of Physics II (electromagnetism) in 2022 and 2023, and we assessed various educational outcome measures. The students overall reported the tool to be intuitive and user-friendly (level of agreement 76%,
N
=
125
), considered it helpful for understanding and recommended its use for introductory physics courses (level of agreement 65%,
N
=
65
).
Funder
University of Göttingen, Open Access Publication Funds
Reference52 articles.
1. Importance of math prerequisites for performance in introductory physics;Burkholder;Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res.,2021
2. Student and textbook presentation of divergence;Smith,2014
3. Core graduate courses: a missed learning opportunity?;Singh;AIP Conf. Proc.,2013
4. Stokes’ theorem: a candidate threshold concept;Yusaf;Practice and Evidence of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,2017
5. Analysis 3