Dimensional analysis and the correspondence between classical and quantum uncertainty

Author:

Gattus VORCID,Karamitsos SORCID

Abstract

Abstract Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is often cited as an example of a ‘purely quantum’ relation with no analogue in the classical limit where → 0. However, this formulation of the classical limit is problematic for many reasons, one of which is dimensional analysis. Since is a dimensionful constant, we may always work in natural units in which = 1. Dimensional analysis teaches us that all physical laws can be expressed purely in terms of dimensionless quantities. This indicates that the existence of a dimensionally consistent constraint on ΔxΔp requires the existence of a dimensionful parameter with units of action, and that any definition of the classical limit must be formulated in terms of dimensionless quantities (such as quantum numbers). Therefore, bounds on classical uncertainty (formulated in terms of statistical ensembles) can only be written in terms of dimensionful scales of the system under consideration, and can be readily compared to their quantum counterparts after being non-dimensionalized. We compare the uncertainty of certain coupled classical systems and their quantum counterparts (such as harmonic oscillators and particles in a box), and show that they converge in the classical limit. We find that since these systems feature additional dimensionful scales, the uncertainty bounds are dependent on multiple dimensionless parameters, in accordance with dimensional considerations.

Publisher

IOP Publishing

Subject

General Physics and Astronomy

Reference38 articles.

1. An undulatory theory of the mechanics of atoms and molecules;Schrödinger;Phys. Rev.,1926

2. A simple mathematical formulation of the correspondence principle;Bernal,2011

3. Correspondence between quantum and classical descriptions for free particles;Huang;Phys. Rev. A,2008

4. The correspondence principle revisited;Liboff;Phys. Today,1984

5. Large quantum-number states and the correspondence principle;Cabrera;Phys. Rev. A,1987

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3