Abstract
Abstract
Energy system models do not represent natural processes but are assumption-laden representations of complex engineered systems, making validation practically impossible. Post-normal science argues that in such cases, it is important to communicate embedded values and uncertainties, rather than establishing whether a model is ‘true’ or ‘correct’. Here, we examine how open energy modelling can achieve this aim by thinking about what ‘a model’ is and how it can be broken up into manageable parts. Collaboration on such building blocks—whether they are primarily code or primarily data—could become a bigger focus area for the energy modelling community. This collaboration may also include harmonisation and intercomparison of building blocks, rather than full models themselves. The aim is understandability, which will make life easier for modellers themselves (by making it easier to develop and apply problem-specific models) as well as for users far away from the modelling process (by making it easier to understand what is qualitatively happening in a model—without putting undue burden on the modellers to document every detail).