Linking local climate scenarios to global warming levels: applicability, prospects and uncertainties

Author:

Becsi BenediktORCID,Formayer HerbertORCID

Abstract

Abstract Global warming levels (GWLs) are increasingly becoming a central concept in climate change studies. In recent years, their integrative quality for climate change impact analysis has been demonstrated, and methodological advancements have helped to compensate for some inherent shortfalls of the concept. However, their applicability at the regional and local level is debatable, and no study to date has examined the possibility of linking local climate scenarios to GWLs. For the case of Austria, we evaluate the relation between global and regional warming patterns, and whether version changes of global climate models could be incorporated into local climate scenarios by means of the GWLs concept, without updating the actual data. We apply the time sampling approach, where GWLs are determined as periods when global mean temperature anomalies cross a certain threshold. GWL periods are sampled both from the global models in the background of the local climate scenarios (CMIP5), and from an equivalent ensemble of newer-generation climate models (CMIP6). Uncertainties resulting from sampling GWLs from different global climate model ensembles are examined, and prospects for local climate change impact assessments are discussed. Accounting for updated global climate model versions might be useful when the changes at certain GWLs are related to fixed reference periods, but temperature increments between GWLs remain relatively constant across model versions, even on the regional level. The study bridges a significant gap to link local climate projections to GWLs. Climate change impacts assessments that build on those datasets can benefit from the integrative character of GWLs, making studies comparable across multiple disciplines and model versions, and thus fostering a way to communicate local climate change impacts more comprehensible.

Funder

Klima- und Energiefonds

Publisher

IOP Publishing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3