Investigating the beliefs of experts on teaching quantum physics at secondary schools: key concepts, topics, and fundamentals

Author:

Onorato PORCID,Mauro M DiORCID,Malgieri MORCID

Abstract

Abstract This study presents the findings of a series of interviews conducted with 17 Italian academic experts in the field of physics. The interviews aimed at exploring various aspects of teaching quantum physics (QP) at the secondary school level. The focus was on evaluating the overall suitability of teaching QP, the benefit of introducing it with an historical approach, the necessary mathematical grounds, as well as foundational and controversial aspects, along with the topics that should be included in the curriculum. Based on the insights gathered from the interviews, a questionnaire was formulated and administered to 31 additional experts, with the primary objective of exploring the experts’ perspectives on whether QP should be included in secondary school curricula and the underlying reasons for their stance. Indeed, some of the scholars argue that teaching QP is crucial as it contributes to the promotion of scientific literacy, considering QP as one of the most significant cultural advancements in science over the past centuries. On the other hand, some experts believe that the emphasis should be placed on informing and educating society about quantum technologies and upcoming technological advancements. The second objective of this questionnaire was to further deepen the investigation into the key subjects that specialists deem essential for teaching at the secondary level. The results revealed a consensus among the experts regarding the concepts that hold significant importance, namely atomic energy levels and quantisation, particle behaviour of light, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, and probability, and regarding the examples, i.e. the photoelectric effect, spectral lines, and the double slit experiment. The last objective of the questionnaire was to address foundational and controversial aspects of QP that are relevant to high school curricula. This entailed examining the consensus among experts regarding their perspectives on the view of these topics. Lack of such consensus emerged.

Publisher

IOP Publishing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3