On improving indicators for assessing the decision support systems’ software quality

Author:

Tikhanychev O V

Abstract

Abstract The article deals with the applied software quality assessing issues. The work relevance is determined by the fact that currently, in the normative documents there is a list of the main characteristics assessing the application programs quality, which, as shown, is not fully fit for purpose, providing no quality control and compliance testing programs to customer requirements, formulated in the development task. One of the reasons for the current situation is the systems’ quality evaluating exclusively quantitative indicators impossibility that combines both technical means and a human operator. An attempt to use world practice, for example, relatively successful quality models from the ISO/IEC 25000: 2014 standards have not yet been implemented: the model itself is allowed for use by regulatory documents (GOST R ISO/IEC 25010-2015), but the quality indicators described in it are not accepted. Private improvements to existing methods do not solve the problem systematically. In the article, based on the software existing approaches to assessing the quality analysis, a scientific and practical problem’s formulation is formulated and one of the approaches to its solution is proposed, based on the existing methods’ refinement for assessing quality based on the model described in GOST R ISO/IEC 25010, taking into account real users needs, interpreted through reducing the errors’ likelihood of the first and second kind that arise when using the software. The formulated problem solution will provide a general increase in the automated control effectiveness through the use of the quantitative and qualitative assessments of the software being developed

Publisher

IOP Publishing

Subject

General Medicine

Reference19 articles.

1. Virtual reality and decision support;Tikhanychev;Journal of Applied Informatics,2019

2. Decision support system as a “virtual headquarters”;Vypasnyak;Military thought,2015

3. About software quality indicators of automated control systems;Tikhanychev;Software systems and computational methods,2020

4. Operationalised product quality models and assessment: The Quamoco approach;Wagner;Information and Software Technology,2015

5. Features of standardization in the field of information technology;Dzuba;Science and Technology of Railways,2017

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Self-Check system of heuristic algorithms as a “New moral” of intelligent systems;VII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “SAFETY PROBLEMS OF CIVIL ENGINEERING CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURES” (SPCECI2021);2023

2. Proposals to Refine the Model for Assessing the Quality of Software Products;Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems;2022-11-16

3. On the Problems of Algorithmization of Automated Decision Support;Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems;2022-11-16

4. Safety Rules of Heuristic Behavior Algorithms as a Prototype of the "Morality" of Robotic Systems;Национальная безопасность / nota bene;2022-06

5. On clarifying the quality control of software products;Программные системы и вычислительные методы;2022-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3