Author:
Šljivic M,Pavlovic A,Kraišnik M,Ilić J
Abstract
Abstract
This study aims to compare the accuracy offered by 3D Slicer Software in printing end-use parts inside a Fused Deposition Modeling process of Additive Manufacturing. The purpose, in particular, is to investigate the surface quality and the dimensional stability of the manufactured parts comparing the effect of selecting a different 3D Slicer tool among Simplify3D, Cura and Slic3r 3D. With this scope, parts were produced using these process tools while results were analysed in terms of accuracy, production time and consumption of material. Results, graphically and visually presented, show significant differences in the dimensional and surface accuracy with an optimum outcome offered by the Simplify3D as best 3D slicer tool. The Simplify3D slicer has essential advantages in printed end-use parts because creates the 3D models with significantly better accuracy and quality support.
Reference34 articles.
1. Fused deposition modeling: a technology evaluation;Grimm;Time-compression technologies,2003
2. Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review;Huang;Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.,2013
3. Optimization Model for Machining Processes Design in Flexible Manufacturing Systems;Lukic;Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems,2018
4. Direct slicing of CAD models for rapid prototyping;Jamieson;Rapid Prototyping Journal,1995
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献