Abstract
Abstract
A questionnaire-based survey has been performed among original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), sub-suppliers, engineering companies, end-users, service & maintenance, and “others”, as part of an investigation to clarify their relationship to expanding pin system, compared to standard, cylindrical pins. In addition, a short literature study on onshore cranes is conducted. The survey is based on 9 questions about safety for personnel and machine, breakage, and wear of pins and supports, and installation and retrieval easiness of pins. The analysis of the responses indicates that safety for personnel and machines/equipment is regarded mainly as either “Important” or “Crucial and decisive”, and that the expanding pin solution is regarded as “better” or “equal” compared to the standard, cylindrical pin, both for “safety level”, “risk for breakage of pin & support”, “tear & wear on pin & support” and “installation and retrieval time”.
Reference21 articles.
1. Finite Element Analysis of Fretting Fatigue Fracture in Lug Joints Made of High Strength Steel;Talemi;Proc.of 12th Int Fatigue Cong - MATEC Web of Conferences – Fatigue 2018,2018
2. Fretting fatigue and wear of mechanical joints: Literature study;Karlsen;2nd COTech & OGTech (Stavanger: 27-29 November 2019), IOP Conference Series:Mater Sci Eng,2019
3. Fretting fatigue failure mechanism of automotive shock absorber valve;Talemi;Int. J. Fatigue,2014
4. Dynamic processes of loader cranes manipulators with excessive backlashes and elastic damping in their hinges;Lagerev;Period. Polytech. Mech. Eng.,2020
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献