Abstract
Abstract
This comment highlights two methodological issues with the recent article by Velten et al [Biomed Phys Eng Express 2023;9:045004]: First, the approach taken in this work with a local effect model (LEM) in 2D leads to a significant overstimation of the number of radiation-induced lesions. This results in order of magnitude smaller predicted survival rates compared to the conventional LEM. Second, the dose without nanoparticles is used as the ‘macroscopic dose’ against which cell survival is plotted. However, for the considered gold concentrations, the average absorbed dose under secondary particle equilibrium is between 2 and 20 times higher with nanoparticles than without.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献