Identifying steady and pulsatile two-phase flow regimes with pressure drop signals and acoustic emissions

Abstract

Abstract Identifying two-phase flow regimes is vital for understanding phase-change heat and mass transfer processes. Traditionally, flow regime identification has relied on subjective flow visualization studies, which are then converted to flow regime maps applicable to specific operating conditions. However, these conventional, largely subjective, maps fall short in predicting abrupt changes in flow patterns that often occur during regular operation of vapor compression and absorption heat pumps and other thermal systems. Conventional flow regime maps are also inadequate for addressing the transient, intermittent, or periodic flow regimes that occur in boiling and condensation enhanced using acoustic and other emerging techniques. Therefore, there is a pressing need for alternative flow regime identification techniques that can adapt and reliably track rapid and local changes in two-phase hydrodynamics. Promising candidates for dynamic flow pattern classification include high-resolution pressure drop signals and acoustic emission spectra, which can provide insights into the local hydrodynamics within a flow channel. To assess the feasibility of these measurement techniques, differential pressure and condenser microphone measurements are recorded alongside high-speed videos of a two-phase flow of saturated R134a. The total mass flux and vapor quality are varied to understand the effects of phase velocity and liquid inventory on wave propagation in the channel. Additionally, forced oscillations are introduced to a steady two-phase flow to analyze their impact on flow patterns and their corresponding pressure drop and acoustic signals. Statistical analyses, including Gaussian mixture modeling, are employed to reveal characteristic pressure drop probability associated with each flow pattern, which form the basis for developing a model capable of predicting flow regimes in both steady and oscillating flows. The resulting framework introduces a new flow regime identification technique that can adapt to dynamic operating conditions, benefiting a wide range of thermal systems and phase-change processes.