Author:
Zhang Zhi,Hirahara Anna,Xue Yaohua,Uchiyama Naoki
Abstract
Abstract
To develop an advanced way of designing transonic airfoils for industry, a reliable and user-friendly mesh generator and a robust CFD solver are necessary. Especially, the prediction of unsteady shock buffet phenomenon is always a focus for the CFD simulation of transonic airfoils. In this study, BOXERmesh (an automatic mesh generator) and NEWT (a robust CFD solver), which are developed by CFS (Cambridge Flow Solutions) in collaboration with MHI (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries), are used to perform the CFD simulation of NACA SC2-0714 transonic airfoil. CFD simulation is conducted at two different attack angles with Mach number as 0.74 and Reynold number as 1.5×107 (non-buffet: α=2°; shock buffet: α=3°). A hexahedral dominant mesh is generated by BOXERmesh with the cell number as 5.52 million. Both unsteady RANS (URANS) and LES are performed using the CFD solver NEWT. Specifically, the governing equation is discretized by central differencing scheme with 2nd order accuracy in space by applying Swanson and Turkel type artificial viscosity, and the Adams-Bashford time integration with the dual-time stepping method is applied for temporal discretization in the density-based solver. Results show CFD simulation could reproduce the time averaged chordwise distribution of pressure coefficient at the two conditions. Both URANS and LES successfully capture the unsteady shock buffet phenomenon when increasing attack angle from 2° to 3°. However, the calculated peak oscillation location and the shock buffet frequency are different between URANS and LES. Applying the same mesh resolution, URANS performances better than LES, with the deviation of the shock buffet frequency less than 6% (Exp.: 69 Hz; URANS: 73 Hz). The reason is considered as the wall-normal mesh refinement near the airfoil surface (y+∼66) being not enough for LES to accurately resolve the turbulence scale and capture the boundary layer separation behavior. On the other hand, URANS is thought to be enough to reproduce the periodic moving of the onset of boundary separation and to predict the main characteristics of the shock buffet phenomenon.
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy
Reference12 articles.
1. Aerodynamic performance and pressure distributions for a NASA SC2-0714 airfoil tested in the Langley 0.3-meter transonic cryogenic tunnel;Jenkins,1988
2. Comparison of computational and experimental results for a supercritical airfoil;Rivers,1994
3. Cryogenic tunnel pressure measurements on a supercritical airfoil for several shock buffet conditions;Bartels,1997
4. Self-sustained shock oscillations on airfoils at transonic speeds;Lee,2001
5. Airfoil transonic flow buffet calculations using the OVERFLOW 2 flower solver;Thomas,2011