Abstract
Abstract
Reproducibility of results is a cornerstone of the scientific method. Scientific computing encounters two challenges when aiming for this goal. Firstly, reproducibility should not depend on details of the runtime environment, such as the compiler version or computing environment, so results are verifiable by third-parties. Secondly, different versions of software code executed in the same runtime environment should produce consistent numerical results for physical quantities. In this manuscript, we test the feasibility of reproducing scientific results obtained using the IllinoisGRMHD code that is part of an open-source community software for simulation in relativistic astrophysics, the Einstein Toolkit. We verify that numerical results of simulating a single isolated neutron star with IllinoisGRMHD can be reproduced, and compare them to results reported by the code authors in 2015. We use two different supercomputers: Expanse at SDSC, and Stampede2 at TACC. By compiling the source code archived along with the paper on both Expanse and Stampede2, we find that IllinoisGRMHD reproduces results published in its announcement paper up to errors comparable to round-off level changes in initial data parameters. We also verify that a current version of IllinoisGRMHD reproduces these results once we account for bug fixes which have occurred since the original publication.
Funder
Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure
High Energy Physics
Subject
Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
Reference31 articles.
1. Reproducibility is a process, not an achievement: the replicability of IR reproducibility experiments;Lin,2020
2. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
3. FAIR for research software (FAIR4RS) WG,2022
4. Towards FAIR principles for research software;Martinez,2020
5. RDA | research data sharing without barriers