Author:
Bonanno E.,Borzì G.R.,Cavalli N.,Pace M.,Stella G.,Zirone L.,Marino C.
Abstract
Abstract
The goal of this work is to investigate the feasibility of
implementing an automated module of a commercial software for
monthly routine Linac QA tests. The AAPM TG 142 report is a
reference document which includes recommendations for general
Quality Assurance (QA) tests for medical linear
accelerators. DoseLab software includes an AutoQA module for users
to run TG-142's Machine QA tests in an automated sequence. The
execution of the individual monthly tests (without DoseLab) is
compared with AutoQA in terms of time consuming, reproducibility,
additional data and user friendliness. The total time required was
195 minutes for single test mode, without DoseLab, and 80 minutes
for AutoQA. Auto QA allows the user to analyze more parameters than
single-test mode, especially for kV and MV images. Different
profiles in sizes and energies are examined in minor time. The
Winston-Lutz test is more quickly and complete. CBCT QA test is less
laborious and no user-dependent. Reproducibility of results is
verified: the coefficient of variation over 5 consecutive repeated
measurements is less than 5%. The software database makes it
possible to monitor the trend of different parameters over
time. AutoQA module significantly reduces the time spent for QA. It
also allows to get more quantitative informations and delete the
user-dependent uncertainties.
Subject
Mathematical Physics,Instrumentation
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献